Antioxidant Activity, Phenolic Profile, And Nephroprotective Potential Of Anastatica Hierochuntica Ethanolic And Aqueous Extracts Against CCl4-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats

Please contact oscar.xiao@wecistanche.com for more

Abstract: Kaff-e-Maryam (Anastatica hierochuntica L.) is extensively used to treat a range of health problems, most notably to ease childbirth and alleviate reproductive system-related disorders. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of A. hierophantic ethanolic (KEE), and aqueous (KAE) extraction CCl4-induced oxidative stress and nephrotoxicity in rats using the biochemical markers for renal functions and antioxidant status as well as histopathological examinations of kidney tissue.A. hierophantic contained 67.49 mg GAE g−1 of total phenolic compounds (TPC), 3.51 µg g−1 of total carotenoids (TC), and 49.78 and 17.45 mg QE g−1 of total flavonoids (TF) and total flflavonols(TFL), respectively. It resulted in 128.71 µmol of TE g−1 of DPPH-RSA and 141.92 µmol of TE g−1of ABTS-RSA. A. hierophantic presented superior antioxidant activity by inhibiting linoleic acid radicals and chelating oxidation metals. The HPLC analysis resulted in 9 and 21 phenolic acids and 6and 2 flavonoids in KEE and KAE with a predominance of sinapic and syringic acids, respectively. Intramuscular injection of vit. E + Se and oral administration of KEE, KAE, and KEE + KAE at250 mg kg−1 body weight significantly restored serum creatinine, urea, K, total protein, and albumin levels. Additionally, they reduced malondialdehyde (MOD), restored reduced-glutathione (GSH), and enhanced superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels. KEE, KAE, and KEE + KAE protected the kidneys from CCl4-nephrotoxicity as they mainly attenuated induced oxidative stress. Total nephroprotection was about 83.27%, 97.62%, and 78.85% for KEE, KAE, and KEE + KAE, respectively. Both vit.E + Se and A. hierophantic extracts attenuated the histopathological alteration in CCl4-treated rats. In conclusion, A. hierophantic, especially KAE, has the potential capability to restore oxidative stability and improve kidney function after CCl4 acute kidney injury better than KEE. Therefore, A. hierophantic has the potential to be a useful therapeutic agent in the treatment of drug-induced nephrotoxicity.

Keywords: Kaff-e-Maryam; polyphenols; bioactivity; secondary metabolites; kidney markers; antioxidant enzymes; renal dysfunction

Please click here to know more

Introduction

Kidney disease is the 9th leading cause of death with more than 1 in 7, that is, 15% of US adults or 37 million people, are estimated to have chronic kidney disease (CKD) [1]. Remarkably, the most common cause of CKD as recorded in 2015 is diabetes mellitus followed by high blood pressure and glomerulonephritis [2]. Other causes of CKD include idiopathic (often associated with small kidneys on renal ultrasound) [3]. Previously, CCl4 was used for metal degreasing, dry cleaning, fabric spotting, fire extinguisher fluids, and grain fumigation [4]. It causes severe disorders in the liver, lungs, and testes as well as in blood by generating active free radicals [5]. According to the findings of Ogeturk et al. [6], exposure to this solvent produces acute and chronic kidney damage. Free radical-induced lipid peroxidation is believed to be one of the primary causes of cell membrane damage, leading to a variety of pathological conditions [7]. The generation of reactive radicals has been implicated in CCl4-induced nephrotoxicity, which is involved in lipid peroxidation and accumulation of dysfunctional proteins, leading to injuries in kidneys [8]. Amazing, traditional uses of medicinal plants have grown in recent years, and numerous investigations have confirmed their therapeutic role against several illnesses [9–12]. Kaff-e-Maryam (Anastatica hierochuntica) is a desert medicinal herb that belongs to the Brassicaceae family. It grows in various regions over the world, especially in Arab countries (e.g., Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Oman, Libya, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait) as well as some Asian, European, and African countries. A. hierophantic is believed to have superior medical potentials and is preferably consumed for various medical conditions [13]. It is mainly used to ease the process of childbirth and for treating reproductive system-related disorders and metabolic disorders, mainly diabetes mellitus [14]. It is used as an analgesic and as a treatment for epilepsy, gastrointestinal disorders, arthritis, bronchial asthma, mouth ulcers, malaria, and mental depression [15–17]. A. hierophantic contains significant amounts of minerals, such as Mg, Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn, which are comparable to or greater than those of many herbal plants, which may give metals chelating properties [18]. Yoshikawa et al. [19] concluded that the presence of flavanones, such as Anastasia A and B, correlates with potent hepatoprotective effects by inhibiting D-galactosamine-induced cytotoxicity in primary cultured mouse hepatocytes. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1 by Kupffer cells in the liver contribute to hepatocyte destruction in D-galactosamine hepatotoxicity [20]. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of A. hierophantic components may help to reduce D-galactosamine-induced hepatotoxicity [21]. A. hierophantic can afford extractdepending on protection against CCl4-hepatotoxicity [22]. However, despite the literature showing promising potentialities related to the use of A. hierophantic, the nephroprotective potential of A. hierophantic ethanolic (KEE) and aqueous (KAE) extracts need to be carefully examined. Moreover, the literature review mainly highlighted the hepatoprotective efficiency of A. hierophantic, but the nephroprotective potential has not been studied so far, thus motivating this work. Therefore, the current study aims to observe the changes in the antioxidative defense enzymes, detect the alterations of renal microscopy after CCl4 administration in rats, and investigate the possible protective effects of A. hierophantic extracts against CCl4-induced renal damage.

Cistanche for improving sexuality 

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation A sample of the Kaff-e-Maryam (A. hierophantic L.) plant was purchased from a native market in Buraydah city, Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. The plant material was authenticated by the Department of Plant Production and Protection, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. The sample was washed with clean tap water to remove sand and dirt from the leaves and then air-dried plant material (at 28 ± 1 ◦C for 48 h.) was mechanically powdered and kept in opaque polyethylene bags at 4 ± 1 ◦C until use. 2.2. Preparation of Ethanolic and Aqueous Extracts Approximately 200 g of dried A. hierophantic were extracted with 300 mL 70% ethanol in a Soxhlet extractor to prepare ethanolic extraction (KEE). The extract was concentrated by a rotary evaporator at 40 ◦C to evaporate the remaining solvent, then to dryness under an N2 stream. The aqueous extraction (KAE) was carried out as described by Asuzu [23] with minor modifications. Two hundred grams of dried plant material were added to 500 mL of hot sterile distilled water. The mixture was then shaken well and allowed to stand for 1 h. Then a reflux condenser was attached to the flask and then heated until boiling gently for 10 min, cooled, shaken well, and filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The filtrate was evaporated by a rotary evaporator, then to dryness under an N2 stream. The alcoholic and aqueous extracts (250 mg mL−1 ) were freshly formulated in distilled water to be used for oral administration. 2.3. Total Phenolic Content (TPC) The TPC content of A. hierophantic was determined according to the adapted method by Bettaieb et al. [24]. The results were compared to a plotted gallic acid (GA) standard curve made in the range of 50–500 mg mL−1 (R2 = 0.99), and the TPC was calculated as mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per gram of A. hierophantic (mg of GAE g−1 ). 2.4. Total Carotenoids (TC), Total Flavonoids (TF), and Total Flavonols (TFL) As reported by Al-Qabba et al. [10], 5 g of A. hierophantic were extracted repeatedly with acetone and petroleum ether mixture (1:1, v/v). Total carotenoids (TC) content was spectrophotometrically determined at 451 nm. TC was expressed as mg g−1 DW. The TF content of A. hierophantic was assayed according to described protocol by Mohdaly et al. [25]. The TF content was calculated as mg quercetin equivalent (QE) per 100 g−1 dw. In the same context, the TFL content was carried out [26]. The absorbance at 440 nm was recorded, and TFL was calculated as mg quercetin equivalent (QE) per 100 g−1 DW. 2.5. Antioxidant Capacity Determination DPPH radical scavenging assay: The RSA was tested spectrophotometrically depending on bleaching of the DPPH purple-colored solution according to an altered technique by Lu et al. [27]. The antiradical capacity was presented as µmol of Trolox equivalents (TE) per gram of A. hierophantic (µmoL TE g−1 ). ABTS radical scavenging activity: The RSA of A. hierophantic against ABTS radicals was tested by the adapted method of Lu et al. [27]. The results were expressed as µmoL TE g−1. β-carotene–linoleic acid bleaching assay: The antioxidant percentage of A. hierophantic was assessed in terms of β-carotene bleaching in comparison to butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) applying an adapted spectrophotometric protocol designated by Koleva et al. [28]; the results were given as BHA-related percentage. Chelating action of A. hierophantic on ferrous ions: The chelating activity of A. hierophantic was measured as protocoled by Zhao et al. [29]. The inhibition % of ferrozine–Fe2+ complex creation as metal chelating action was measured and presented as mg mL−1 when ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as a positive control was used. 2.6. Polyphenolic Compound Fractionation of A. hierophantic Aqueous and Ethanolic Extracts Determination of polyphenols from ethanolic and aqueous extracts was performed by an HP1100 (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) HPLC system equipped with an auto-sampler, quaternary pump, and diode array detector (Hewlett Packard 1050) using a column (Altima C18 150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) with a 5 mm Altima C18 guard column (Alltech, Nettetal, Germany) according to Goupy et al. [30]. The solvent system used was a gradient of A (acetic acid 2.5%), B (acetic acid 8%), and C (acetonitrile). The solvent fellow rate was 1 mL min−1, and separation was performed at 35 ◦C. The injected volume was 10 µL. Phenolic compounds were assayed by external standard calibration and expressed as mg g−1 DW of equivalents (+)-catechin for flavan-3-ols and equivalent coumarin for polar aromatic compounds. A variability of 8% was determined on five extractions of phenolics from the same sample. All values were the mean of duplicate injections. Polyphenols and their derivatives were identified and quantified at 280 and 320 nm, while flavonoids were identified at 360 nm. 2.7. Experimental Design All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) of QU (No. 15-4-2017), KSA, which is regulated by the Purpose of the Control and the Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) Committee under the National Committee of Bioethics (NCBE), Implementing Regulations of the Law of Ethics of Research on Living Creatures. A total of 36 male albino rats were used in the current study and divided into 6 groups of 6 animals each and treated as follows: Group I (Control) received an intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) of olive oil (1.0 mL kg−1 twice a week) and 0.5 mL distilled water orally/daily for 21 successive days. Group II received i.p. injection of a fresh mixture of equal volumes of CCl4 and olive oil (at a dose of 1.0 mL kg−1 twice a week) and 0.5 mL distilled water orally/daily according to Al-Qabba et al. [10] with minor modifications. Group III (reference group) received an intramuscular injection (i.m.) of 50 mg kg−1 vit. E + Se (Selepherol, Vetoquinol Co., Magny-Vernois, France) twice a week, according to Asuka et al. [31] and El-Desoky et al. [32], and 0.5 mL distilled water orally/daily. Group IV served as a test and received 250 mg kg−1 of KEE orally/daily along with CCl4 i.p. twice a week. Group V received 250 mg kg−1 of KAE orally/daily along with CCl4 i.p. twice a week. Group VI received 250 mg kg−1 of KEE + KAE (1:1) orally/daily along with CCl4 i.p. twice a week. Twenty-four hours after the last treatment (day 21), the rats were anesthetized by the mixture (alcohol:chloroform: ether, 1:2:3). Blood samples from heart puncture were collected for all animals, and serum was separated by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min and kept at −20 ◦C for biochemical examination. 2.7.1. Kidney Biochemical Analysis Serum creatinine, urea, total protein, and albumin concentrations were determined by automated spectrophotometric methods (BM/Hitachi autoanalyzer-911; Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Potassium levels were determined by flame photometry at 766 nm. 2.7.2. Estimation of Renal Antioxidant Activity After the collection of blood samples, animals of all groups were sacrificed; right kidneys were rapidly isolated and rinsed with ice-cold saline. The tissue was then clipped, rinsed in cold saline, blotted dry, and placed on ice immediately. Using an electrical tissue homogenizer, portions of the tissue (1.0 g) were weighed and homogenized with 9 volumes of ice-cold 0.05 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.4. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm (4 ◦C) for 20 min to collect supernatants for determination of malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration [33], superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity [34], and reduced glutathione (GSH) content [35]. Protein concentration in kidney homogenate was determined using the Bradford method [36]. 2.7.3. Nephroprotection Percentage The nephroprotection (F) percentages of vit. E + Se, KEE, KAE, and KEE + KAE were calculated for each biochemical parameter separately according to Wakchaure et al. [37] using the following equation: F% = [1 − (T − N) (C − N)] × 100 (1) where T = mean value of treatment group, C = mean value of the positive control group, and N= mean value of the negative control group. Moreover, the total nephroprotection percentage (TFP %) was compared to it. E + Seas follows TFP% = Sum of F% of the biochemical parameters of each extract sum of F% of the biochemical parameters of it. E + Se × 100 (2) 2.7.4. Histopathological Studies Autopsy samples were collected from the left kidney of separate groups of rats and fixed in 10% formalin saline for 24 h. Washing with tap water was followed by dehydration with serial dilutions of alcohol (methyl, ethyl, and absolute ethyl). Specimens were cleaned in xylene and embedded in paraffin for 24 h at 56 ◦C in a hot air oven. Paraffin bees wax tissue blocks were prepared for sectioning at 4-micron thickness using a sled microtome. Tissue slices were collected on glass slides, deparaffinized, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for regular inspection under a light electric microscope [38]. 2.8. Statistical Analysis The results are shown as mean ± standard error (SE). The significance of differences between means in various groups was examined using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s test, and a p-value among means was given at the p < 0.05 level [39]. 3. Results 3.1. Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Capacity of A. hierophantic The quantitative analysis of A. hierophantic phytochemicals and related antioxidant activities using DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging, β-carotene–linoleic acid bleaching activities, and chelating ability (CA) were performed. As can clearly be seen in Table 1, TPC content was 67.49 mg GAE g−1. The TC content was 3.51 µg g−1. The TF and TL contents were 49.78 and 17.45 mg QE g−1, respectively. Moreover, DPPH-RSA and ABTS-RSA were used to measure the progression of antioxidant activities. Results indicated 128.71 µmol of TE g−1 and 141.92 µmol of TE g−1 for DPPH-RSA and ABTS-RSA, respectively. Additionally, the antioxidant activity (AOA) of A. hierophantic is presented in Table 1. The inhibition percentage of linoleic acid radicals was calculated as 45.74% compared to BHA using β-Carotene bleaching (β-CB) assay. Furthermore, evaluation of the metal-chelating activity revealed 42.89 mg g−1, which seems to be proficient in interfering with Fe2+–ferrozine complex formation, indicating its capability to chelate oxidation metals. Table 1. Total phenolic content, total carotenoids, total flavonoids, total flflavonols, and relative potential antioxidant activities of A. hierophantic (mean ± SE), n = 6.

3.2. Quantification of A. hierophantic Phenolic Compounds The quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds for KEE and KAE by HPLC analysis was carried out, and data are tabulated in Table 2. Nine separated phenolic acids and six flavonoids were identified in detectable amounts from the KEE of A. hierophantic. The most abundant phenolic acids were hydroxycinnamic acids such as sinapic acid (28.704 mg 100 g−1 ) followed by caffeic acid (6.621 mg 100 g−1 ), rosmarinic acid (2.884 mg 100 g−1 ), ferulic acid (1.854 mg 100 g−1 ), and cinnamic acid (0.094 mg 100 g−1 ); and hydroxy-benzoic acids such as p-hydroxybenzoic acid (3.440 mg 100 g−1 ), protocatechuic acid (1.811 mg 100 g−1 ), vanillic acid (3.326 mg 100 g−1 ), and syringic acid (1.083 mg 100 g−1 ). Flavonoids such as myricetin (16.269 mg 100 g−1 ), D-catechin (2.410 mg 100 g−1 ), kaempferol (0.434 mg 100 g−1 ), rutin (0.539 mg 100 g−1 ), apigenin-7-glucoside (0.192 mg 100 g−1 ), and quercetin (0.184 mg 100 g−1 ) invaluable amounts were detected. The phenolic compounds in KAE of A. hierophantic were also determined, and data are tabulated in Table 2. Syringic acid was recorded as the highest phenolic acid among the 21 identified phenolics. Catechol and pyrogallol were 2.526 and 1.589 mg 100 g−1, respectively. Data indicated that some phenolic acids such as caffeic, catechin, chlorogenic, epicatechin,e-vanillic, p-hydroxybenzoic, and protocatechuic acids were detected in the moderate amounts of 0.725, 0.256, 0.136, 0.193, 0.443, 0.223, and 0.454 mg 100 g−1, respectively. In the same context, low amounts of 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamic, 4-aminobenzoic, benzoic, cinnamic, coumarin, ellagic, ferulic, gallic, iso-ferulic, α-coumaric, p-coumaric, and salicylic acids were quantified after being identified. Epicatechin and D-catechin as flavonoids were quantified in KAE of A. hierophantic as well.

3.3. Serum Creatinine, Urea, K, Total Protein, and Albumin Levels CCl4 injection substantially raised serum creatinine, urea, and k levels in GII rats when compared to control rats (GI). Conversely, total protein and albumin levels were significantly decreased in CCl4-treated rats (Table 3). Vit. E + Se and A. hierophantic extracts (G III, IV, V, and VI) substantially reduced the alterations in creatinine and urea caused by CCl4 injection, while they increased albumin and total proteins to be close to normal values in GI (Table 3). Serum k level was markedly increased in CCl4-treated rats (GII) when compared to GI (Table 3). The injection of vit. E + Se and administration of A. hierophantic alcoholic and aqueous extracts (G IV, V, and VI) was also positively improved the k level when compared to GI (Table 3).

3.4. Renal Antioxidant Biomarkers As shown in Table 4, administration of CCl4 significantly reduced SOD and GSH levels and increased the MDA level in GII kidney homogenate tissue. However, when compared to GI, rats treated with both vit. E + Se and A. hierophantic extracts (GIII, VI, V, and VI) exhibited a substantial improvement in the activity of antioxidant enzymes SOD and GSH, as well as a reduction in MDA levels (Table 4). A. hierophantic alcoholic extract (GIV) outperformed A. hierophantic aqueous extract (GV) and combined A. hierophantic alcoholic and aqueous extracts in attenuating antioxidant levels, and combating the autoxidation process resulted in low MDA levels when compared to GI.

3.5. Nephroprotection Percentage The nephroprotection percentage (relative to the negative control (GI) and positive (GII) groups) of kidney functions such as creatinine, urea, k, TP, and albumin as well as antioxidant activities in kidney homogenate (MDA, SOD, GSH) is illustrated in Table 5. The nephroprotection % recorded the highest value as creatinine, urea, k in GIII, TP, and albumin in GV, MDA, and GSH in GIII and SOD in GV (Table 5). The total nephroprotection % relative to vit. E + Se treatment registered maximum levels in the KAE treated group (GV, 97.62%), then KEE (GIV, 83.27%), and then KEE + KAE (GVI, 78.85%), as revealed in Table 5.

Discussion

superior antioxidant agents. Polyphenolic substances are thought to have anti-carcinogenic and anti-mutagenic properties in humans [40]. A valuable TPC content in A. hierophantic was slightly higher than that obtained by Mohamed et al. [21] as 51.97 mg GAE g−1 in A. hierochuntica herb and by AlGamdi et al. [41], who found 4 mmol L−1 GAE in A. hierophantic seeds. Recently, Zin et al. [42] indicated the presence of tannins in A. hierophantic as a bioactive compound and recommended its bioactivity, which needed to be deeply investigated. The β-carotene content, as a part of total carotenoids, was 2.27 µg g−1 as mentioned by Mohamed et al. [21], and even current results presented total carotenoids as 3.51 µg g−1. Similar findings in flavonoid and flavonol contents have been indicated by Mohamed et al. [21]. Biologically active components, such as phenolic compounds, present antioxidant activity as breakdowns of lipid oxidation chain reactions by giving hydrogen to active free radicals. This scavenging potential of phenolics to inhibit radicals was elucidated by their phenolic hydroxyl groups [8,10,22]. This phenolic acid has been described as an effective antioxidant component, including hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, and superoxide anion [43]. A. hierophantic metal chelating activity seems to be proficient in interfering with “Fe2+–ferrozine” complex construction, suggesting its ability to capture “ferrous” ions before “ferrozine”. A positive relationship between an increase in their contents of phenolic compounds is directly indicated with their antioxidant capacity [42]. Andjelković et al. [44] established the activity of numerous phenolic acids to form complexes with metals. The valuable TPC and relevant antioxidant activities using different measuring approaches give a clear plate from and confirm the bioactivity of A. hierochuntica as a medicinal herb for food or beverage applications. Biologically active components, such as phenolic compounds, present antioxidant activity as breakdowns of lipid oxidation chain reactions by donating hydrogen to active free radicals [45]. This scavenging potential of phenolics to inhibit radicals was elucidated

effective antioxidant component, including hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, and superoxide anion [43,45,47]. The identified and quantified compounds by HPLC in KAE of A. hierophantic were higher than the number of identified compounds in KEE, but identified compounds in KEE of A. hierophantic were presented in higher amounts [22]. The results reflect that the consuming A. hierophantic could present many components in both polar and non-polar forms. These results are similarly presented by AlGamdi et al. [41] as they identified and quantified 20 polyphenolic compounds in seeds of A. hirerochuntica. The extract contained chlorogenic acids and hydroxybenzoic acids, but the main components were flavone C-glycosides, C-glycosides, O-glycosides, and O-glycoside-C-glycosides occurring predominantly as luteolin conjugates. In addition, 14 of the 20 compounds in A. hierophantic extract exhibited antioxidant activity using an HPLC-on-line antioxidant detection system [41]. Interestingly, current data confirmed that A. hierophantic is rich in phytochemicals compounds and is a good source of natural antioxidants with potential health benefits, as has been scarcely highlighted before in seeds [41]. Hence, tea prepared from the whole plant powder is the traditional form of consumption; data illustrated new identified bioactive compounds in KEE and KAE of A. hirerochuntica, which differed from those found in AlGamdi et al. [41] In numerous studies, CCl4-induced nephrotoxicity is utilized as a model system for testing the nephroprotective effect of plant extracts/drugs [48,49]. The current study looked at the effect of A. hierophantic extracts on CCl4-induced kidney damage, as well as its nephroprotection and antioxidant potential in rats. In the current study, the CCl4 treatment (GII) group significantly increased creatinine, urea, and k levels and decreased total protein and albumin concentrations when compared to GI. This might be because CCl4 intoxication is a major source of free radical production in numerous organs, including the liver, kidneys, lungs, brain, and blood [50]. It has also been observed that following CCl4 injection in rats, the concentration of CCl4 is distributed more evenly in the kidneys than in the liver [51], since the kidney has a high affinity for CCl4 and contains cytochrome P450, predominantly in the cortex. The most common free radicals from CCl4 are trichloromethyl radical (CCl3• ) and trichloromethyl peroxyl radical (CCl3O2• ) [52]. These radicals attach to an intracellular protein, cell membrane lipids, and DNA, causing protein denaturation, lipid peroxidation, and oxidative DNA damage that leads to cell death [53]. In contrast, treating CCl4-rats with it. E + Se (GIII) and A. hierophantic extracts (GVI: VI) efficiently attenuated these rises in creatinine and urea levels as well as increased serum albumin and total proteins to be very close to their levels in GI. This may be due to the antioxidant properties and rich phenolic content of A. hierophantic extracts and antioxidant capacity and chelating activity of it. E + Se, which scavenges free radicals thereby inhibiting the renal damage. Phytochemicals are the most highly effective free radical scavengers and are considered superior antioxidant agents from plants [54]. The most abundant phenolic compounds were hydroxycinnamic acids, such as sinapic acid, among the nine identified phenolic compounds in KEE, while syringic acid was the highest phenolic acid among the 21 identified phenolic acids in KAE. Six flflavonoids were identified in KEE and two in KAE using HPLC analysis [55]. Furthermore, as an antioxidant, it. E is believed to protect tissues from harm caused by reactive oxygen metabolites. Selenium is also well recognized to be an essential trace mineral for human health, shielding cells from the damaging effects of free radicals [22]. In the current study, CCl4 administration markedly decreased GSH and SOD and increased MDA levels in kidney homogenates relative to GI. Vit. E + Se and A. hierophantic extracts ameliorated the diverse effects of CCl4 by restoring the altered activity of antioxidant agents such as SOD and GSH and may deactivate the process of producing the MDA, as was recently reported [15,21,40,41]. GSH is a non-enzymatic antioxidant that is found in all mammalian cells. With its oxidized form, GSSG, GSH acts as a cofactor for numerous detoxifying enzymes (GPx, GST, and others) against oxidative stress and maintains cellular redox balance [47]. This finding is in accordance with those of Khan and Siddique [56] and Makni et al. [57], who reported that CCl4 decreased the GSH level in rat kidneys. Treatment with it. E + Se and A. hierophantic extracts showed protection against reduction in GSH level triggered by CCl4. In the same context, SOD catalyzes the dismutation of two molecules of superoxide anion (*O2) to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and molecular oxygen (O2), consequently rendering the potentially harmful superoxide anion less hazardous [58,59]. CCl4 intoxication alters the gene expression level by depleting renal SOD [60]. A decrease in SOD activity is a sensitive index of cellular damage. Our tested A. hierophantic extracts ameliorated renal toxicity by alleviating the level of SOD. It participates in various enzymatic processes to reduce the concentration of de-to acidification reactions [61]. MDA is the first product of lipid peroxidation and is one of the important markers of oxidative stress. A. hierophantic extracts diminished the increase in MDA levels and restored total antioxidant power in the CCl4-treated rat kidneys. These protective effects may be due to the powerful antioxidative activity of A. hierophantic extracts [15,21,40,41]. These results also suggest that A. hierophantic extracts may attenuate oxidative stress by decreasing levels of lipid peroxide in CCl4-exposed rat kidneys and prevent renal damage. These results agreed with the results of the antioxidative activities of Zn on CCl4-induced acute nephrotoxicity [62,63]. A. hirerochuntica extracts presented valuable nephroprotection capacity regarding kidney function tests (creatinine, urea, K, TP, and albumin) and kidney homogenate antioxidant activities (GSH, SOD, MDA) in GIV, V, and IV, respectively. The total nephroprotection % relative to vit. E + Se treatment registered maximum levels in the KAE treated group (GV, 97.62%), then KEE (GIV, 83.27%), and then KEE + KAE (GVI, 78.85%), respectively, in descending order. This may be due to differences in quantity and quality of phenolic and antioxidant contents of A. hirerochuntica extracts, which have a relation to antioxidant capacity [15,19,22,40,42]. The histopathological findings in kidneys are consistent with the biochemical estimations of the experimental groups investigated. CCl4 administration (GII) caused a glomerular and tubular lesion with vasocongestion in the kidneys. Dogukan et al. [64] discovered a similar histological pattern in rat renal tissue in response to prolonged CCl4 treatment. It is also considered that histological changes are caused by functional overloading of nephrons, which leads to renal dysfunction [65], and/or are due to the destruction of tissue provoked as a consequence of free radical generation via CCl4 metabolism [56,66]. The effect of it. E + Se and A. hierophantic extracts to repair and restore kidneys' destruction effects of CCl4 were notable. This may be because of it. E + Se (as a potent antioxidant) acts on ROS induced by CCl4 [67]. A. hierophantic extracts suppress CCl4-induced acute nephrotoxicity due to the antioxidative role and free radical scavenging properties of the phenolic compounds present in A. hirerochuntica extracts [22]. Our findings are consistent with those of other researchers who have shown that various plant derivatives have pharmacological effects by eliminating CCl4 abuses and restoring to normality [6].

Conclusions

Results of this study clearly demonstrated that A. hierophantic plant is rich in polar and nonpolar phenolic compounds with a superior antioxidant capacity, which is directly related to the phytochemical content. A. hierophantic (particularly aqueous extract) protects rats against CCl4-induced oxidative stress and acute kidney injury, as evidenced by a significant drop in MDA levels and increased GSH and SOD activity, as well as the cessation of biochemical and histological alterations in the kidneys. The protective effificacymight arise from the antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties of the phenolic compounds present in the A. hierophantic extracts. These characteristics help to explain the plant's medicinal efficacy as a herbal medication. More research is needed to completely describe the active principles in A. hierophantic, and this study is meant to stimulate more-comprehensive related research to offer sufficient data and recommendations for defifiningits mechanisms and safe doses.

References

1. Statistics, K.D. Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States. 2021. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/kidneydisease/pdf/ Chronic-Kidney-Disease-in-the-US-2021-h.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021).
2. Ku, E.; Glidden, D.V.; Johansen, K.L.; Sarnak, M.; Tighiouart, H.; Grimes, B.; Hsu, C.Y. Association between strict blood pressure control during chronic kidney disease and lower mortality after the onset of end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2015, 87, 1055–1060. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Tumlin, J.A.; Madaio, M.P.; Hennigar, R. Idiopathic IgA nephropathy: Pathogenesis, histopathology, and therapeutic options. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007, 2, 1054–1061. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Olah, G.; Reddy, V.P.; Prakash, G.S.; Reactions, F.C. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. Contact Lenses 1978, 720–742.
5. Ozturk, F.; Ucar, M.; Ozturk, I.C.; Vardi, N.; Batcioglu, K. Carbon tetrachloride-induced nephrotoxicity and protective effect of betaine in Sprague-Dawley rats. Urology 2003, 62, 353–356. [CrossRef]
6. Ogeturk, M.; Kus, I.; Colakoglu, N.; Zararsiz, I.; Ilhan, N.; Sarsilmaz, M. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester protects kidneys against carbon tetrachloride toxicity in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 97, 273–280. [CrossRef]
7. Slater, T.F. Free Radical Mechanisms in Tissue Injury. In Cell Function and Disease; Cañedo, L.E., Todd, L.E., Packer, L., Jaz, J., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1988; pp. 209–218. [CrossRef]
8. Khan, M.R.; Rizvi, W.; Khan, G.N.; Khan, R.A.; Shaheen, S. Carbon tetrachloride-induced nephrotoxicity in rats: Protective role of Digera muricata. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 122, 91–99. [CrossRef]
9. Afsar, T.; Khan, M.R.; Razak, S.; Ullah, S.; Mirza, B. Antipyretic, anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity of Acacia hydaspica R. Parker and its phytochemical analysis. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 1–12. [CrossRef]
10. Al-Qabba, M.M.; El-Mowafy, M.A.; Althwab, S.A.; Alfheeaid, H.A.; Aljutaily, T.; Barakat, H. Phenolic profile, antioxidant activity, and ameliorating efficacy of Chenopodium quinoa sprouts against CCl4 -induced oxidative stress in rats. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2904. [CrossRef]