Assessment Of Renal Volume With MRI: Experimental Protocol Part 1

Mar 28, 2023

Abstract

Renal length and volume are important parameters in the clinical assessment of patients with diabetes mellitus, kidney transplants, or renal artery stenosis. Kidney size is used in primary diagnostics to differentiate between acute (rather swollen kidneys) and chronic (a rather small kidney) pathophysiology. Total kidney volume is also an established biomarker in studies for the treatment of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). There are several factors influencing kidney size, and there is still a debate on the value of the measured kidney size in terms of renal function or cardiovascular risk. The renal volume is most often calculated by measuring the three axes of the kidney, on the assumption that the organ resembles an ellipsoid. By default, the longitudinal and transverse diameters of the kidney are measured. In animal models, renal length and volume1 are also important parameters in the assessment of organ rejection after transplantation and the determination of kidney failure due to renal artery stenosis, recurrent urinary tract infections, or diabetes mellitus. In general total kidney volume (TKV) is a valuable parameter for predicting prognosis and monitoring disease progression in animal models of human diseases like polycystic kidney disease (PKD) or acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

This chapter is based upon work from the COST Action PARENCHIMA, a community-driven network funded by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) program of the European Union, which aims to improve the reproducibility and standardization of renal MRI biomarkers. This analysis protocol is complemented by two separate chapters describing the basic concept and experimental procedure.
Keywords Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Kidney, Mice, Rats, T2, T1, Volume

1 Introduction

Kidney size is used in primary diagnostics to differentiate between acute (rather swollen kidneys) and chronic (rather a small kidney) pathophysiologies. Renal length and volume are important parameters in the clinical assessment of patients with diabetes mellitus, kidney transplants, or renal artery stenosis. Total kidney volume (TKV) is also qualified as a biomarker in studies for the treatment of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). According to the nonbinding recommendations of the FDA, this biomarker can be used by drug developers for the qualified context of use in submissions of investigational new drug applications, new drug applications, and biologics license applications. There are many factors governing kidney size and volume.

In recent years, research into the use of stem cells and a Chinese herbal remedy for the treatment of kidney diseases has gained great attention. The main mechanism of the two therapies is to promote the repair of injured renal tissues and protect the remaining renal functions

The Chinese herbal remedy,cistanche, has been used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat various chronic kidney diseases since ancient times. It is reported that cistanche has the potential to reduce inflammation, reduce kidney fibrosis, and promote the synthesis of extracellular matrix components. It has been revealed that these effects are due to its bioactive components, including many phenolic substances, triterpenoids, and coumarins.

On the other hand, stem cell technology has caused a revolution in medical practice. Research has demonstrated that stem cells can differentiate into various types of renal cells and perform therapeutic activities, including protecting the remaining functional renal tissues, slowing down tissue fibrosis, and repairing damaged renal tissues.

cistanche portugal

Click on Cistanche Tubulosa Supplement

Ask for more: 

david.deng@wecistanche.com  WhatApp:86 13632399501

Ultimately, the combination of traditional Chinese medicine with modern science could be the key to treating various kidney diseases. This strategy has gradually been accepted by the medical community and studies have already shown that the combined therapy of cistanche and stem cell treatment may considerably reduce the mortality rate of kidney diseases. 

In conclusion, the use of cistanche and stem cell treatment in the treatment of kidney diseases shows great potential and requires further research. The combined therapy of the two treatments could provide an improved treatment option for those facing kidney diseases.

In patients, renal volume is probably one of the most important predictive parameters for the loss of renal function. Therefore, a determination of kidney size is recommended for patients at risk. For example ADPKD patients <30 years with a combined renal volume >1500 mL and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <90 mL/min are at high risk even with otherwise normal renal function. Such patients will need renal replacement therapy within 20 years. In ADPKD patients renal volume measurements have been studied extensively and provide a method for patient stratification, monitoring of disease progression, and therapeutic efficacy [1–3].

Also, therapeutic decisions are frequently based on the size of the kidney, and for example routinely assessed in the follow-up of patients with renal stenosis or for assessment of renal transplant candidates [4, 5]. Therefore it is important to employ a measuring method that provides accurate and precise results in vivo.

cistanche in urdu

In animal models, renal length and volume are also important parameters in the assessment of organ rejection after transplantation and the determination of kidney failure due to renal artery stenosis, recurrent urinary tract infections, or diabetes mellitus. In general total kidney volume (TKV) is a valuable parameter for predicting prognosis and monitoring disease progression in models of polycystic kidney disease (PKD). Still, so far, no gold standard exists for renal volumetry in vivo.

The renal volume is most often calculated by measuring the three axes of the kidney, on the assumption that the organ resembles an ellipsoid. By default, the longitudinal and transverse diameters of the kidney are measured. The kidney volume is calculated according to the following approximation formula (in humans these kidney volume data correlate well with the body length and age) (see Fig. 1):

volume = length ×width ×average depth ×0.5.

Conventional anatomic MRI offers easy access to high-quality image data. Kidney volume is reliably reproduced, and measurements can be performed with minimal bias and low inter- and intraoperator variability [6]. In the voxel-count method, the accurate calculation is facilitated by the acquisition of multiple consecutive images sectioning the kidney. After identification of the organ boundaries, the summation of all voxel volumes lying within the organ boundaries provides the total renal volume. While such an approach is highly accurate, it is also time-consuming. Transferring TKV measurement into everyday practice requires imaging techniques and protocols that are widely available while easy to employ and fast. Furthermore, methods for the interpretation of results are needed that are feasible and easy to apply. For this purpose, open-source image analysis tools are available that facilitate fast and easy determination of TKV.

desert cistanche benefits

For anatomical MRI of the kidney T2 weighted MRI sequences is the modality of choice. They provide excellent contrast between different tissues and the different compartments of the kidney itself. Standard spin-echo T2 weighted imaging sequences are time-consuming due to the long repetition times TR. However, they still offer the best image quality concerning reproducibility and inter-slice variability. Additionally, such sequences can be modified easily

to perform multi-echo imaging, resulting in a set of images with different weighting that even can be used to calculate T2 maps. In this tutorial, we demonstrate the applicability of a 2D T2 weighted multi-echo MRI for accurate determination of kidney volume and compare different standardized TKV measurement techniques using MRI scanners developed for clinical routine imaging or dedicated to (preclinical) small animal imaging.
This chapter is part of the book Pohlmann A, Niendorf T (eds) (2020) Preclinical MRI of the Kidney—Methods and Protocols. Springer, New York.

2 Materials

2.1 Animals

These experimental protocols are tailored for mice (C57BL/6J) with a body mass of 20–30 g. Advice for adaptation to rats (Wistar, Sprague-Dawley, or Lewis) is given in Subheading 4 where necessary.

cistanche tablets benefits

2.2 Lab Equipment

1. Anesthesia: For standard experiments, isoflurane inhalation (CP-Pharma, Baxter) provides robust anesthesia for up to 2 h with comparatively few side effects on renal physiology. For a detailed description and discussion of the anesthesia please refer to the chapter by Kaucsar T et al. “Preparation and Monitoring of Small Animals in Renal MRI.”
2. Gases: O2 or compressed air, as delivering system for evaporated isoflurane. Besides air for use with pulse oximetry systems for monitoring blood oxygenation, O2 gas is preferred during the experiment on diseased animals.

3. Devices for physiological monitoring ECG, temperature, and respiration, to trigger the image acquisition: for example SAI (Model 1030, SAII, Stony Brook, NY, US).

2.3 MRI Hardware

The general hardware requirements for renal 1H MRI on mice and rats are described in the chapter by Ramos Delgado P et al. “Hardware Considerations for Preclinical Magnetic Resonance of the Kidney” (open-access). The technique described in this chapter was tailored for a 9.4 T MR system (Biospec 94/20, Bruker Biospin, Ettlingen, Germany) but advice for adaptation to other field strengths and systems (e.g., 4.7 T Varian and 3 T Siemens Skyra human MR scanner using a wrist RF coil (for signal reception) or knee RF coil (transmit-receive)) is given where necessary.

With preclinical MRI systems volume RF coils covering the entire mouse or rat bodies can be used for signal transmission and reception. However, if needed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can be elevated by using dedicated surface receive RF coils (i.e., mouse heart four-element surface RF coil or rat heart four-element surface RF coil) in combination with linearly polarized transmit-only volume RF coils.

No other special or additional hardware is required.

2.4 MRI Protocols

For anatomical MRI of the kidney T2-weighted MRI sequences is the modality of choice. Accelerated imaging techniques are available on all MRI systems. On Bruker systems, they are identified by acronyms“RARE” or“turboRARE” (for rapid acquisition relaxation enhanced). On Philips and Siemens, scanners such sequences usually are denoted “FSE” or “TSE” (for fast spin echo or turbo spin echo).

2.5 Image Analysis Tools

MRI data can be analyzed easily by manual planimetry or by calculating TKV from length and width measurements with different standardized equations2 (the “Traditional Ellipsoid,” the “Mayo Ellipsoid,” and the “Mid-slice Method”). For this we recommend employing the open-source imaging tools ImageJ or IcY:

1. ImageJand the Versatile Wand Tool. 

2. IcY. 

For providing the ex vivo gold standard, kidney volumes can be additionally measured post-mortem, using the fluid displacement method.

3 Methods

Renal volumes can be calculated in several ways, using the ellipsoid formula or the voxel-count method. For the ellipsoid formula calculation, the length is determined on the sagittal scans. The width and thickness will be measured at the hilum on the transverse scans. The width can also be measured at the largest transverse diameter. Both volume-hilum and volume-maximum will be calculated. Volume measurements using the ellipsoid formula can easily be done in less than 2 min. In most clinical studies, the ellipsoid method is commonly applied for renal volume assessment. With this method, it is assumed that the kidney resembles an ellipsoid structure. This leads to systematic underestimation of the renal volume. The kidney is not a true ellipsoid structure.

cistanche sold near me

With the voxel-count method, the volumes of all voxels within the boundary of the kidney are summated, thus giving the true total volume of the kidney so that obtaining inaccurate results is highly unlikely. For the voxel-count method, the kidney has to be segmented manually. Segmentations can be done by tracing the boundaries of the kidney on each slice. The total renal volume will then be calculated by summation of all voxel volumes lying within the boundaries of the kidney. Partial volume effects, which occur if voxels contain both kidney and surrounding tissue, could lead to an overestimation of the kidney volume if such voxels are included within the boundaries of the kidney. To avoid such an overestimation, the segmentation line can be drawn halfway along the change in signal intensity between the kidney and surrounding tissues. Semiautomatic segmentation techniques, such as region-growing, can save time. However, such methods are not practical to use for most available software. Neighboring tissues with very similar signal intensity still have to be separated manually. Fat within the kidneys might perturb the segmentation of the boundaries due to fat-water chemical shift artifacts when using the region-growing segmentation technique, leading to an underestimation of the total volume. Semiautomatic segmentation techniques are also challenging to perform on images obtained with accelerated T2-weighted MRI sequences. While accelerated T2-weighted imaging yields good results when organ morphology is considered, signal-to-noise ratio fluctuations between the individual slices due to spatial changes in the noise amplification intrinsic to parallel imaging techniques cannot be entirely prevented. For this reason, the selection of threshold values and propagation has to be done individually for each slice and is a source of investigator bias and experimental error. Newer segmentation techniques, like automatic contour detection, might be an option in future software implementations.
Calculating renal volume from both coronal and sagittal scans can help eliminate differences due to aberrations in slice positioning.
Furthermore, there is a simplified Mid-Slice Technique for MRI. In this technique, the renal volume is calculated from the area of a single middle slice image of the kidney multiplied by the number of slices. The kidney volumes correlate well with stereology and have high reproducibility comparable with manual planimetry. However, when calculating single kidney volumes, both the mid-slice technique and the ellipsoid formula are less accurate than stereology and manual or semiautomatic planimetry. Although significantly faster than manual tracing for calculating kidney volume, this technique is slower than the standard ellipsoid method. Volume estimates are based on a multiplier linked to the hypothesis that the shape of the kidney is ellipsoidal.
All these approaches rely on geometrical assumptions, that might not be true.
1. Load the 2D multislice multi-echo sequence (MSME). (preferred see Note 1)
2. Set the shortest echo time (TE) and echo spacing (ΔTE) possible, under the condition that fat and water are in phase (see Note 2). The last TE should be close to the largest expected T2 (*)in the kidney multiplied by 1.5 (see Note 3). The aim is to acquire at least five echo images. Consider increasing the acquisition bandwidth and using half Fourier acceleration to shorten the first TE and ΔTE (see Note 4).
3. Choose the shortest possible repetition time (TR) for good signal-to-noise per time (SNR/t) efficiency. TR will be limited by the length of the echo train and the number of slices you acquire.
4. Adapt the flip angle (FA) to the TR and T1 to achieve the best possible SNR. Use the Ernst angle αE = arccos (exp (-TR/T1)) as a good starting value. Then try a few smaller and larger FAs and determine the optimal FA experimentally by comparing the measured SNRs.

5. Set a high acquisition bandwidth (BW) to shorten ΔTE, while keeping an eye on the SNR, which decreases with the square root of BW. Low SNR may be balanced out with averaging (see Note 5).

6. Enable fat saturation. On ultrahigh field systems, this works well to avoid fat signals overlaying the kidney due to chemical shifts. At lower field strengths it might work less efficiently.

7. Enable the respiration trigger (per phase step or slice). This is essential to reduce motion artifacts (see also Note 6), and reduce motion blurring and unwanted intensities variations among the images acquired with different TEs.
8. Choose as phase-encoding direction the L-R direction and adapt the geometry so that the FOV in this direction includes the entire animal (approx. 40 mm).
9. Use frequency encoding in head-feet (rostral-caudal) direction to avoid severe aliasing. Adjust the FOV to your needs keeping in mind that in this direction the FOV can be smaller than the animal and a smaller FOV permits a smaller acquisition matrix, and in turn a shorter echo spacing.
10. Use an appropriate slice thickness, typically around 1.0 mm.
11. Use the high in-plane resolution that the SNR allows, typically between 100 and 200 μm. Zero-filling in phase encoding direction can be helpful to speed up acquisition. One may use half Fourier in read direction (asymmetric echo) to further shorten the first TE, if very short T2* (<5 ms) can occur. Reducing the excitation pulse length to below 1 ms would then also help to shorten TE.
12. A spin echo sequence (MSME) with an echo time of >20 ms is very sensitive to the instabilities of your system. If the system is not stable for any reason, this can often be observed directly at the time signal.
13. For examples of specific parameter sets please see Notes 9–13. 


You Might Also Like