Brain Connectivity Alterations During Sleep By Closed-loop Transcranial Neurostimulation Predict Metamemory Sensitivity Part 1

ABSTRACT

Metamemory involves the ability to correctly judge the accuracy of our memories. The retrieval of memories can be improved using transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) during sleep, but evidence for improvements to metamemory sensitivity is limited. 

Memory retrieval refers to the process of retrieving information stored in the brain through various means when memory forgetting occurs. In our daily study life, memory retrieval is a very important link. It can not only help us consolidate the knowledge we have learned but also improve our memory.

Memory is a person's ability to preserve and recall information, and it is inseparable from learning. Only with a strong memory can we master more knowledge and skills and play a greater role in our daily lives.

Memory retrieval and memory are closely related. Memory retrieval is when we need to use certain knowledge, we will search and recall it, and this process of searching and recalling is memory retrieval. If our memory is not strong enough, we will have difficulty retrieving memory and may forget, which will affect our learning effect and performance.

Therefore, improving memory is not a simple matter, but we can use some scientific methods and techniques to help us enhance memory. For example, we can consolidate memory through repeated learning, use association skills to further deepen memory, or activate our brains in different ways to further improve memory.

In short, memory retrieval and memory are closely related. Only when we have strong memory can we perform memory retrieval better and achieve better learning results. Let us have the courage to challenge ourselves, improve our memory through continuous learning and practice, and lay a solid foundation for our future. It can be seen that we need to improve memory, and Cistanche deserticola can significantly improve memory because Cistanche deserticola is a traditional Chinese medicinal material that has many unique effects, one of which is to improve memory. The efficacy of Cistanche deserticola comes from the multiple active ingredients it contains, including tannic acid, polysaccharides, flavonoid glycosides, etc. These ingredients can promote brain health through a variety of pathways.

Click know 10 ways to improve memory

Applying tES can enhance sleep-dependent memory consolidation, which along with metamemory requires the coordination of activity across distributed neural systems, suggesting that examining functional connectivity is important for understanding these processes. 

Nevertheless, little research has examined how functional connectivity modulations relate to overnight changes in metamemory sensitivity. Here, we developed a closed-loop short-duration tES method, time-locked to up-states of ongoing slow-wave oscillations, to cue specific memory replays in humans. We measured electroencephalographic (EEG) coherence changes following stimulation pulses, and characterized network alterations with graph-theoretic metrics. 

Using machine learning techniques, we show that pulsed tES elicited network changes in multiple frequency bands, including increased connectivity in the theta band and increased efficiency in the spindle band. Additionally, stimulation-induced changes in beta-band path length were predictive of overnight changes in metamemory sensitivity. 

These findings add new insights to the growing literature investigating increases in memory performance through brain stimulation during sleep and highlight the importance of examining functional connectivity to explain its effects.

AUTHOR SUMMARY

Numerous studies have demonstrated a clear link between sleep and memory-namely, memories are consolidated during sleep, leading to more stable and long-lasting representations. 

We have previously shown that tagging episodes with specific patterns of brain stimulation during encoding and replaying those patterns during sleep can enhance this consolidation process to improve confidence and decision-making of memories (metamemory). 

Here, we extend this work to examine network-level brain changes that occur following stimulation during sleep that predict metamemory improvements. Using graph theoretic and machine-learning methods, we found that stimulation-induced changes in beta-band path length predicted overnight improvements in metamemory. 

This novel finding sheds new light on the neural mechanisms of memory consolidation and suggests potential applications for improving metamemory.

INTRODUCTION

The brain has the remarkable ability to turn brief encounters and episodes, even "one-shot" encounters, into long-lasting memories. This occurs through a process known as memory consolidation, in which memories in a labile state are replayed during sleep and converted to more stable representations. However, successful retrieval of memories involves control processes and decision-making, and even memories that are consolidated during sleep may be difficult to recall or retrieve with little confidence in their veracity (Koriat & Goldsmith, 1996). 

Metamemory sensitivity, or an individual's ability to judge the accuracy of their memories with confidence, plays a critical role in the usage of our memories. For instance, an eyewitness to a crime may have successfully encoded critical details of the episode, but may not be confident in their memory, leading to incorrect decisions (Luus & Wells, 1994; Memon et al., 2003; Sporer et al., 1995). 

Thus, improving not only memory retrieval but also metamemory sensitivity is of critical importance. Here, we investigated the improvement of sensitivity with an intervention while individuals slept. During sleep, neuronal ensembles representing previously encoded memories are reactivated in both the hippocampus and neocortical areas (Euston et al., 2007; Ji & Wilson, 2007; Nádasdy et al., 1999; Sirota et al., 2003; Skaggs & McNaughton, 1996; Wilson & McNaughton, 1994). 

Memory replays are predominantly observed during slow-wave sleep, particularly during the positive phases, or up-states, of the ongoing 0.5–1.2 Hz oscillation (Lee & Wilson, 2002; Mölle & Born, 2011). Reactivations of encoding-specific neuronal patterns are accompanied by 12–15 Hz thalamocortical oscillatory activity known as spindles, as well as short-lived high-frequency bursts in the hippocampus called ripples (De Gennaro & Ferrara, 2003; Mölle et al., 2006). 

The intricate coordination of replays, spindles, and ripples is essential to facilitate the consolidation of memories into long-term storage or to transfer memories from the hippocampus to the neocortex (McClelland et al., 1995; McGaugh, 2000; Rasch & Born, 2013; Staresina et al., 2015). 

Consolidation of memories not only may facilitate their later retrieval, but also may be related to the individual's future confidence in them; namely, consolidation can strengthen memories and improve learning (Walker & Stickgold, 2004), and confidence in memories is related to memory fidelity (Dallenbach, 1913). 

Thus, targeting the consolidation process with an intervention could benefit not only retrieval success but also metamemory sensitivity. Over the past decade, researchers have increasingly investigated ways of boosting memory consolidation processes through external manipulations. These intervention studies have shown that sleep-dependent memory consolidation can be enhanced in two ways. 

First, memory reactivations can be triggered during sleep by reexposing individuals to external sensory cues, such as odors or sounds that were present during encoding (Antony et al., 2012; Oudiette & Paller, 2013; Schreiner & Rasch, 2014; Rasch et al., 2007; Rudoy et al., 2009). This cued reactivation can lead to benefits in recall for the specific items previously associated with the cues. 

Second, multiple studies have shown that applying transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) at particular frequencies to the brain during sleep can potentiate endogenous electrophysiological processes, leading to facilitation of memory consolidation and subsequent recognition or recall (Ketz et al., 2018; Ladenbauer et al., 2016, 2017; Lustenberger et al., 2016; Marshall et al., 2006, 2004; Westerberg et al., 2015). 

These studies have demonstrated a general increase in memory retrieval performance following tES during sleep. Importantly, this stimulation-related benefit to memory could potentially be due to frequency-specific alterations in functional connectivity between brain regions (Krause et al., 2017). 

To summarize, previous research indicates that retrieval of memories can be strengthened through neurostimulation during sleep, and would potentially suggest that individuals would also have greater metamemory sensitivity, or greater correlation in the accuracy and confidence for their memory decisions, for these episodes. 

Indeed, some research has demonstrated a relationship between healthy uninterrupted sleep and intact metamemory judgments (Daurat et al., 2010). However, this may not be the case, as other research has demonstrated dissociations between first-order decisions (recognition judgments) and second-order decisions (confidence judgments; Del Cul et al., 2009; Hebart et al., 2016; Rounis et al., 2010). 

This is important, as memory confidence can decrease over time (Shapira & Pansky, 2019), leading to errors in memory reporting and poorer decision-making. 

Neural stimulation of the prefrontal cortex has been shown to improve memory monitoring for general knowledge questions (Chua & Ahmed, 2016; Chua et al., 2017), and theta-burst stimulation to depress the activity of the frontopolar cortex influenced metacognitive judgments (Ryals et al., 2016), suggesting tES techniques could be effective for improving and maintaining memory sensitivity for newly one-shot encoded episodes. 

Indeed, recent work in our lab has shown that unique spatiotemporal amplitude-modulated patterns (STAMPs) of tES can be used to boost the sleep consolidation and sensitivity of judgments of specific episodic memories acquired in immersive virtual reality (Pilly et al., 2020). 

In this paper, we extend previous work on cueing memory reactivation by investigating changes in functional connectivity following short-duration tES patterns (namely, STAMPs) during sleep. 

Functional connectivity has previously been shown to be affected by tES during wake (Polanía et al., 2011, 2012), as well as by memory consolidation during sleep (Mölle et al., 2004). Additionally, consolidation of memories in the brain is thought to be a systems-level process, in that it is supported by a combination of short-range and long-range communication across brain structures (Staresina et al., 2015). 

This is likely similar to metamemory, as research has shown connectivity between a distributed network of brain areas, including the frontal cortex, precuneus, and hippocampus supports memory and metacognitive judgments (Baird et al., 2013; Molenberghs et al., 2016; Morales et al., 2018; Ren et al., 2018; Ye et al., 2019). 

Thus, understanding how changes in functional connectivity relate to this process is critical; however, to our knowledge, no study to date has examined how changes in functional connectivity due to stimulation during sleep might affect or relate to memory consolidation and decision-making processes.

To examine changes in functional connectivity, we used measures of EEG coherence (Nunez, 1995), specifically the imaginary part of coherency (Nolte et al., 2004), and extracted features of connectivity from the coherence data with graph theoretical analyses (Bullmore & Sporns, 2009; Sporns, 2003). 

This approach models the functional connectivity of the brain as an interconnected graph and allows for the exploration of the relationship between network structure and function. 

While we were interested in connectivity changes in the Spindle band, we expanded the analysis to include several other frequency bands, as activity in many spectral bands has been related to memory processes (Hanslmayr & Staudigl, 2014; Hanslmayr et al., 2012; Lisman & Jensen, 2013). We then employed machine learning–based techniques to determine the important graph theoretic features for discriminating between Active and Sham stimulation conditions, as well as predicting overnight changes in episodic memory behavior. 

In this way, we provide novel insight into modulations in functional connectivity following pulsed tES that are related to changes in metamemory sensitivity for specific episodic memories.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The participants reported in this paper are the same group of participants from Pilly et al. (2020). They received unique brief spatiotemporal patterns of tES (namely, STAMPs) during encoding of episodic information, half of which were reapplied during up-states of slow-wave oscillations (SWOs) during subsequent nights to cue reactivation of the specific associated memories (Active condition). 

At another point in time, the same individuals also performed the memory task without brain stimulation (Sham condition). 

Therefore, we were interested not only in the changes in functional connectivity that differed between the Active and Sham stimulation conditions but also in the connectivity changes following STAMPs that were related to changes in the recall of specific episodic memories from pre- to post-sleep.

Participants

A total of 30 healthy participants completed the experiment, who were recruited using flyers placed around the campus of the University of New Mexico and the surrounding community and received monetary compensation upon completion of the study. 

Of these, six participants were excluded from the analyses due to either equipment failure to stimulate during an Active night, or noncompliance in following task instructions. 

The sleep EEG data from an additional six participants could not be used to calculate functional connectivity measures due to excessive artifacts, leading to the inclusion of N = 18 participants in the final analysis and reporting. All participants provided signed informed consent to participate in the study, which was approved by the Chesapeake Institutional Review Board. 

All participants were native English speakers, had normal or corrected-to-normal hearing and vision, and had no history of neurological or psychiatric disorder, or drug abuse.

Behavioral Paradigm and Procedure
An outline of the experimental procedure is presented in Figure 1. The experiment was made up of an acclimation period to train participants and let them sleep in the lab, followed by two experimental nights involving learning and testing. 

The acclimation night was only to allow participants to become accustomed to sleeping in the lab, and EEG data was not recorded or analyzed from this period. Participants encoded information on the first experimental night. The memory task consisted of viewing virtual reality episodes administered with an HTC Vive VR headset, followed by several memory recall tests on details from the episodes. 

Participants encoded 14 virtual reality vignettes, each lasting about a minute, depicting a series of events with two or more characters committing some action around an apartment complex. An additional vignette that was longer was used to train participants during the acclimation period. Participants were tested on their memory for the vignettes across five test sessions administered throughout 48 hr with a non-VR computerized task built in MATLAB. 

For each vignette, 10 test items were constructed that consisted of True/False statements on specific aspects of the vignette. Each of the five test lists contained 28 items, 2 for each vignette. Participants reported whether the test statements were True/False, as well as the confidence of their recall on a scale of 1–10. Participants slept in the lab for each of the three nights. 

The procedure consisted of four experimental sessions and one acclimation session. In the acclimation session, participants viewed a long practice vignette answered practice test questions, and afterward slept in the lab. In the following first experimental session (Session 1), participants encoded the experimental stimuli. 

Half of the participants received unique tES with unique STAMPs during the viewing of vignettes (Active condition), whereas the other half did not receive any stimulation (Sham condition). The participants received the opposite stimulation condition over two additional experimental nights separated by about 1 week. After completing the vignette viewing procedure, participants were given their first memory recall test and then slept overnight in the lab. This night, and not the acclimation night, was considered "Night 1." 

The participants in the Active condition received half of the STAMPs during the night to cue consolidation of specific memories during the night. In contrast, participants in the Sham condition did not receive stimulation during the night. Note that this study design allowed us to compare memory performance for episodes that received STAMP stimulation during encoding and sleep (Tag & Cue) to episodes that only received stimulation at encoding (Tag & No Cue). For the connectivity analyses, we focused on the Tag & Cue and Sham (no encoding or sleep stimulation) conditions. 

After the participants awoke, they were given a second memory test, and the experimental session concluded. The second experimental session (Session 2) occurred in the evening after the first session. Participants were given a third memory test in the evening, went to sleep, and received another memory test after waking. 

This second period of sleeping in the lab was considered "Night 2." Active group participants once again received STAMPs during the night. The final memory test was administered later in the evening. For the opposite stimulation condition (Sessions 3 and 4), the participants viewed a new set of 14 vignettes and were administered corresponding memory recall tests over 2 days. In this way, the experiment was a within-subjects manipulation, with the Active and Sham conditions occurring approximately 1 week apart. 

The assignment of the stimulation condition order (Active first vs. Sham first), as well as the assignment of vignettes, were counterbalanced across participants. The analyses reported in this paper focus on Night 2, where the largest behavioral effects of STAMP stimulation were found (see Pilly et al., 2020, for further details).

For more information:1950477648nn@gmail.com