Effectiveness Of A Metacognitive Intervention For Schizophrenia (MCI-S) Program For Symptom Relief And Improvement in Social Cognitive Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia Part 1

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the effectiveness of a metacognitive intervention program for symptom relief and improvement in social cognitive functioning among adults with schizophrenia. 

Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness that affects a person's thinking, mood, and behavior. One of the common symptoms is memory loss.

However, as an adult with schizophrenia, we cannot just see this negative aspect and ignore the inspiration and inspiration it brings.

First, although our memory is affected, it does not mean we cannot learn and grow. We can make up for our lack of memory by using various methods, such as writing down notes, using pictures and audio, etc. This is not only conducive to our learning but also helps us have a deeper knowledge and understanding of our own lives and the world.

Secondly, patients with schizophrenia need to pay more attention to physical health issues. Because we must maintain a stable emotional and living state to better cope with various challenges and pressures. Through a healthy lifestyle and a proper diet, we can enhance the health of our body and brain. This will undoubtedly help us improve our ability to study and work, and further enhance our self-confidence and self-esteem.

Finally, we must keep a positive attitude inside ourselves. To do this, we can seek help and support, such as joining social groups, receiving psychological counseling, etc. This can help us better understand and accept our physical and emotional states, while also laying a solid foundation for our future.

In short, although the memory of patients with schizophrenia is affected, we still have many advantages and potential to make ourselves better through study and life efforts. Let us face any difficulties and challenges in life with positivity and hope. It can be seen that we need to improve memory, and Cistanche deserticola can significantly improve memory because Cistanche deserticola is a traditional Chinese medicinal material that has many unique effects, one of which is to improve memory. The efficacy of minced meat comes from the various active ingredients it contains, including acid, polysaccharides, flavonoids, etc. These ingredients can promote brain health in various ways.

Click know 10 ways to improve memory

The program focused on enhancing metacognition to encourage self-awareness and step-by-step perspective expansion. There were 24 participants in the experimental group and 19 participants in the control group. Delusions decreased, and social cognition and social functioning improved in the experimental group compared to the control group. 

The program demonstrated utility as a treatment modality, which can be part of an overall program of a mental health promotion institution to improve functioning in patients with schizophrenia.

Introduction

The main psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia destroy an individual's ability to evaluate reality accurately and negatively affect one's quality of life, putting limits on one's social life as well as personal aspects of daily living (Ben-Zeev et al., 2020; Jensen, 2020). 

Auditory hallucinations are a phenomenon in which thoughts from inside a person feel like they are coming from outside of the person. The person subjectively experiences something vividly, although there is no stimulation sensed by the sensory organ (Jensen, 2020). 

Delusions are when individuals grant meaning to their thoughts and beliefs even though they run contrary to what is generally accepted or what the person has experienced (Sellers et al., 2016). 

Patients with schizophrenia often experience hallucinations and delusions, which cause confusion and pain if they do not realize that the hallucinations and delusions are in their minds and not due to someone or something external to themselves (Prochwicz, 2015; Simonsen et al., 2020).

Numerous studies worldwide have investigated the epidemiology of schizophrenia, reporting a lifetime prevalence of 0.3–0.7 % in the general population, and rates in South Korea have been similar to those reported in other countries (Cho et al., 2020). 

Fine et al. (2007) maintained that the main psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia appear to be due to cognitive bias distorting the processing of information from the external environment. Lazarus and Folkman (1987) insisted that personal cognitive assessment and the selection of a method to cope with the relationship between humans and the environment determine adaptation or maladaptation. 

In this regard, the main psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia appear as residual symptoms when patients are in the community rehabilitation stage, and the symptoms should be viewed as something to manage as opposed to the expectation of full recovery (Jensen, 2020).

The treatment of schizophrenia aims to effectively manage symptoms, integrate the patient into the community, and, to the extent possible, assist the patient in maintaining an independent life in the community (Keepers et al., 2020). 

Although developments in the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia have been remarkable, pharmacological treatment alone has not prevented a revolving door phenomenon in which rehospitalization frequently occurs (Ciudad et al., 2012). To promote the recovery and treatment effects of patients with schizophrenia, there is a need to offer psychosocial interventions alongside pharmacological treatment (Kern et al., 2009). 

As a psychological treatment to reduce psychotic symptoms, cognitive behavioral therapy shows relatively consistent effects, but the effects are not large compared with a control group (Jauhar et al., 2014). 

In addition, various types of interventions, such as cognitive intervention and psychoeducation, have been developed, and the effects of these interventions on psychotic symptoms have been small to moderate (Eichner & Berna, 2016; Lejeune et al., 2021).

Moritz and Woodward (2007) developed metacognitive training based on a cognitive-behavioral model. Metacognitive training consists of increasing the patient's awareness of and control over their cognitive distortions and abnormal behavior. 

Wells and Matthews (1994) argued that a bias towards one's way of thinking and response to stress generates a reverse effect, and psychopathy is caused by a self-regulatory executive function (S-REF) model. Further, individuals can solve various mental problems by controlling reactions to their way of thinking and thoughts through metacognition.
Wells (2009) argued that the process of repeated worrying and rumination in psychopathy can be controlled by metacognition and developed metacognitive therapy based on the S-REF model. 

Metacognitive therapy focuses on the details of thought, including negative auto-thinking or irrational beliefs, and views cognition as hierarchical; through upper cognition, namely metacognition, metacognitive therapy focuses on changing one's way of thinking (Fisher & Wells, 2009).

A metacognition-applied program involves changing the cognitive basis of distorted thought through metacognition, and the program aims to increase insight into one's cognitive distortions. The principle of the program is that patients are not confined to cognitive traps because they learn to observe their thinking and exert metacognitive control (Moritz et al., 2010). 

For patients with schizophrenia, the application of metacognition helps them to see subjective experiences more objectively by expanding their perspective of themselves, others, and situations. To be able to recognize their psychotic symptoms when experiencing them means improvement in insight, which can be connected to interpersonal relationships and improvement in social functioning (Bell, Raihani, & Wilkinson, 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Parker et al., 2020). Such a change is regarded as an essential process for rehabilitating people with schizophrenia (Manoli et al., 2021). 

When patients recognize their psychotic symptoms in relationships with others, it is referred to as social cognition improvement (Bell et al., 2017). 

Social cognition is related to personal and social performance (PSP); realizing how people understand themselves and others encompasses an ability to understand others' behavior and infer their mental state (Fiske & Taylor, 2013).

Lysaker et al. (2014) reported that the social cognition of patients with schizophrenia is related to social functioning and that social functioning and metacognition are uniquely related.

Recognizing and managing hallucinations and delusions by applying metacognition has been shown to improve PSP, insight, and social cognition (Eichner & Berna, 2016). 

However, the evaluation of the effectiveness of metacognitive programs is necessary to verify a proper intervention method (Philipp et al., 2019). Consequently, this study aimed to develop a metacognitive intervention program to expand the perspectives on self-recognition, others, and situations, focusing on cognitive assessment and a method to cope with psychotic symptoms. 

The program, Metacognitive Intervention for Schizophrenia (MCI-S), was developed by revising and complementing Metacognitive Training (MCTain) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCTherp) (Moritz & Woodward, 2007; Wells, 2009). The effectiveness of the MCI-S program was evaluated for symptom relief and functional improvement in patients with schizophrenia.

Methods

Design

The study was a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study with a nonequivalent control group. The MCI-S program was conducted at three community psychosocial rehabilitation facilities located in three regions of Korea. 

One other facility in a different location was used to recruit participants for the control group. Treatment in a general community rehabilitation program includes case management and standard psychiatric rehabilitation services (referred to as TAU for "treatment as usual"). The study compared the effects of the MCI-S program plus TAU to TAU only. 

To calculate the sample size needed, G*Power 3.1 was used (Faul et al., 2007). Based on previous studies (Moritz et al., 2013), the sample size required for a power of 0.80, a significance level of 0.05, an effect size of 0.25, and a two-way ANOVA, 36 participants were required. 

However, 50 were recruited in consideration of representativeness, the normal distribution, and the dropout rate because the dropout rate reported in previous studies was 31 % (Van Oosterhout et al., 2014). 

Facilities that had never executed a cognitive behavioral therapy program were contacted to recruit participants. The pre-and post-assessments and a follow-up assessment were performed in the mental health programs where the participants were receiving treatment. All participants completed a pre-assessment questionnaire before the beginning of the MCI-S program. 

Post-assessment occurred immediately after the program ended, and the follow-up assessment was conducted in the fourth week after the post-assessment. The intervention was offered to the control group after the study ended. Approval for the study was received from K University's Institutional Review Board (No. 40525-202004-HR-006-04).

Participants

The participants were patients diagnosed with schizophrenia based on DSM-5 criteria and who were registered with community mental health promotion institutions. Criteria for participation included those aged 18–65, psychiatrically stable, and taking antipsychotic medication for three months, who understood the purpose of the study and agreed to participate by indicating their consent in writing. 

The exclusion criteria included a history of brain damage, a history of drug abuse within the past three years, and patients with a neurological disorder, including intellectual disability or visual perception disorder. Although the aim was to recruit 25 people for each group, initially 25 participants comprised the experimental group, and 20 participants comprised the control group. 

One participant in the experiment group dropped out after the fifth session. One person in the control group dropped out before the final assessment. Thus, the analysis included 24 participants in the experimental group and 19 in the control group (Fig. 1).

Process of developing the intervention (MCI-S)

First, the process in which participants view their subjective experience from the metacognitive perspective in handling their main psychotic symptoms is very important. To this end, the content of the program reflecting domestic schizophrenia is essential. Second, patients with schizophrenia have difficulty accepting external stimulations due to their psychotic symptoms (Moritz et al., 2021). 

There is a need to compose the content so that feelings of frustration are reduced. Third, a step-by-step approach is needed for participants to understand and apply metacognition. 

To improve and expand metacognitive ability, self-recognition needs to be conducted first, from which understanding of others and situations is possible. Perspective expansion into others and situations is possible only if metacognition is first applied to oneself.

The metacognition therapy of Wells (2009) is suitable for recognizing one's inner problems and applying metacognition. The metacognitive training of Moritz and Woodward (2007) consists of content to expand metacognition so that three perspectives-oneself, others, and situations-can be viewed, and so it is suitable for the second stage. 

The researcher of this study applied a metacognitive program step-by-step by integrating the two metacognitive therapies. In the stage where the participant applies metacognition for the first time, recognizes their symptoms, and views problems as they are, the program's content was based on a revised and complementary version of Wells' (2009) metacognitive therapy. 

In the stage where the participant identifies social context from various perspectives based on increased self-recognition, the content of the program was based on a revised and complementary version of Moritz and Woodward's (2007) metacognitive training.

The program was initially reviewed by a group of five experts including a professor of psychiatric nursing, a psychologist, and three mental health workers with experience working in psychosocial rehabilitation programs with patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. 

The content validity index of the program was calculated (Lynn, 1986) for the group of experts. All five rated the items as either three or four points (using a four-point scale), indicating the program content was suitable.

A preliminary evaluation was conducted after experts verified the program's validity to evaluate the study's applicability. In this evaluation, three patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who were participating in a psychosocial rehabilitation program within a mental health welfare center were selected. 

They were told the purpose of this study, provided their consent, and participated in a demonstration program lasting three hours on October 15, 2020. By reflecting on the results of this preliminary evaluation, additional examples were added to the program, and this study enabled the participants to easily understand and apply a metacognitive perspective.

The composition of the MCI-S program is shown in Table 1. The program consists of two stages. In the first stage, participants' commitment, anxiety, excessive worry, threat, control of thinking, and avoidance are identified through metacognitive intervention. They realize the wrong use of a metacognitive belief, and the metacognition is revised. 

In the second stage, in which the participants may experience excessive confidence, self-focus, and commitment generated by characteristic symptoms of schizophrenia, namely attribution bias and hasty concluding, participants begin to recognize others and social situations through metacognitive training. In other words, the program consists of a self-recognition stage and an others and situations recognition stage for step-by-step perspective expansion to be carried out. 

The most important element in developing the MCI-S program was that patients participating in the program would objectively observe and recognize their situations about their main psychotic symptoms, accept themselves, and expand their perspective to include others and other possible situations.

Research procedures

The program consisted of 10 sessions for 10 weeks, once a week, and 90 min per session. 

There were 5–10 people in each group. The first 20 minutes involved reviewing the details learned in the previous session. The next 50 min involved the content to be learned and the related activity. The last 20 min focused on sharing feelings and opinions about the session and providing guidance on the tasks to be completed for the next session. 

The content of the program included the following: nickname and self-introduction, Self-Attention Rating Scale presentation, the practice of attention training technique, discernment of experience and one's thinking, the difference between worry and reality, distancing from worries (Wells, 2009), putting yourself in someone else's shoes or communication, not making hasty decisions, outer and inner values (Moritz & Woodward, 2007), and establishing a plan to practice in everyday life. 

Each session started with completing a self-attention rating scale (Wells, 2009). The purpose of the scale is to self-check their level of concentration so that they are better able to focus their attention (Wells, 2009). 

Then, the program was executed in which the participants shared their experiences after various examples of the session topic were explained to them. 

A workbook containing each session's content and an activity report were distributed to each participant in advance, and printed materials were offered in each session so that the participants could remember metacognition principles and program content.

For more information:1950477648nn@gmail.com