Visual Exploration in Adults: Habituation, Mere Exposure, Or Optimal Level Of Arousal? Part 1

Abstract

Exploration is one of the most powerful behaviors that drive learning from infancy to adulthood. The current study aimed to examine the role of novelty and subjective preference in visual exploration. 

Infancy is one of the most important stages of human growth. The experiences at this stage have a decisive impact on our entire life, including memory. It is known that cognitive and memory abilities are not fully developed in infancy, but this does not mean that there are no memories in infancy.

Early experiences and feelings in infancy can influence later memory formation. For example, a warm, intimate, and rich environment of food and play can help guide babies to develop positive emotional experiences, which can stimulate children's interest in the outside world and thus provide a foundation for future learning. Additionally, during infancy, children learn new skills and behaviors through observation and imitation. These formed behavioral patterns and experiences will be continuously used and strengthened in the future learning and memory process.

In addition, brain scientists have also found that visual and verbal stimulation in infancy can promote the connections and branches of brain neurons, which provides the necessary neural basis for children's later cognitive development and memory abilities. Therefore, creating a safe, rich, and warm environment is crucial for the development of memory in infancy.

In short, although memory development in infancy is still in its infancy, providing children with appropriate stimulation and love is an important step in establishing a good memory foundation. These positive experiences will have a profound impact on children's future learning and social interactions, helping them achieve a happy life and a successful career. It can be seen that we need to improve our health. Cistanche deserticola can significantly improve memory because Cistanche deserticola is a traditional Chinese medicinal material that has many unique effects, one of which is to improve memory. The efficacy of minced meat comes from its various active ingredients, including acid, polysaccharides, flavonoids, etc. These ingredients can promote brain health in various ways.

Click know 10 ways to improve memory

To do this, we combined a visual exploration task with a subjective evaluation task, presenting novel and familiar pictures. The first goal was to ascertain whether, as demonstrated in babies, short habituation favors visual exploration of familiarity, whereas longer habituation leads to an exploration of novelty. 

The second goal was to evaluate the influence of familiarization on participants' subjective evaluation of the stimuli. When presented with novel and very familiar stimuli, participants explored the novel stimuli more. 

In line with the optimal level of the arousal model, participants showed more positive evaluations of the semi-familiar stimuli compared with very familiar or very novel ones.

Keywords:

Habituation. Mere exposure effect.Optimal levels of arousal. Engagement. Exploratory behaviors.

Exploration is one of the most powerful behaviors that drive learning from infancy to adulthood (Oudeyer et al., 2016). Much current cognitive research explores the mechanisms of learning without considering how and why certain stimuli are prioritized for exploration (Mather, 2013). 

Yet the factors driving exploratory behaviors are strong determinants of what skills will be learned and subsequent developmental trajectories. Habituation and mere exposure effects have been the main models to explain the human response to novelty and familiarity. 

According to habituation theory, repeated exposure to a stimulus typically leads to a drop in interest in that stimulus, allowing for novelty preference. Habituation is a simple form of nonassociative learning, in which a behavioral response decreases due to repeated stimulation, without involving sensory adaptation, sensory fatigue, or motor fatigue (Rankin et al., 2009). 

This form of learning has an adaptive value by allowing human and nonhuman animals to filter out irrelevant iterative elements to direct their attention to new stimuli (Eisenstein et al., 1995). Habituation has been shown in several studies with human adults, mostly for visual (Bernstein, 1969; Bradley et al., 1993; Hare et al., 1970; Mangelsdorff & Zuckerman, 1975) and auditory stimuli (Eisenstein et al., 1995; Potter et al., 2015). 

The orientation response following habituation has mainly been studied in terms of physiological response to stimulus repetition, such as changes in electrodermal activity, heart rate, or event-related potentials (Bradley, 2009; Graham & Clifton, 1966; Sokolov, 1963). 

Several studies on covert orienting of attention have also used response times from the appearance of the target, to investigate habituation to distracting stimuli (Turatto et al., 2018; Turatto & Pascucci, 2016). 

However, behavioral responses such as looking time have received little attention in human adults. In contrast, looking time has been used extensively in infant research on habituation (Fantz, 1958; Oakes, 2010). 

For instance, once the infant is habituated to a stimulus or a class of stimuli (typically measured by a drop in looking time), researchers can examine which novel stimuli or stimulus features may produce renewed interest. 

This can allow testing discrimination abilities, and identify what infants perceive as novel relative to familiar (Sirois & Mareschal, 2004). In such habituation research with babies, the term "novelty preference" is often used when participants are looking relatively more (frequency and/or duration) at new stimuli (Fantz, 1958). 

This should not be construed as a positively valenced behavior, as preference, in this case, is related to preferential processing, and it distinguishes alternative behaviors purely quantitatively (relative looking times, relative changes in heart rate, etc.).

In contrast, the mere exposure effect is another psychological phenomenon that describes systematic valenced preference (a positive attitude) towards familiarity, not novelty. Zajonc (1968) proposed that the mere repeated exposure to a stimulus enhances a person's attitude toward it. In one of his experiments, participants were exposed to nonsense words. 

Each word was presented 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, or 25 times. Results revealed that words with 5, 10, and 25 exposures were rated as more positive than the ones with 0, 1, or 2 exposures. The mere exposure effect has since been shown in several modalities: visual (Bornstein, 1989; Zajonc, 1968, 2001), auditory (Heingartner & Hall, 1974; Wilson, 1979), olfactory (Balogh & Porter, 1986; Cain & Johnson, 1978), and gustatory (Crandall, 1985; Pliner, 1982). 

According to the hedonic fluency model (Bornstein & D'Agostino, 1994), this preference for familiarity results from more fluent processing of familiar stimuli (Clore & Huntsinger, 2007; Clore & Palmer, 2009; Reber et al., 2004; Rotteveel & Phaf, 2007; Schwarz et al., 1991; Whittlesea, 1993; Whittlesea & Williams, 2001; Winkielman et al., 2003). 

Thus, there are seemingly contradictory results stemming from the habituation and the mere exposure literature; the first facilitates orientation toward novel information in preference tests, while the latter results in orientation toward familiar information. 

Why would we explore stimuli we like less to a greater extent? Three theoretical models, the optimal level of arousal (or stimulation) model, the two-factor model of mere exposure, and the dual-process theory provide explanations for this apparent contradiction. 

They all predict a preference for semi-familiarity, or semi-novelty (Berlyne, 1960, 1970; Bornstein, 1989; Colombo & Mitchell, 2009; Kaplan et al., 1990; Mather, 2013; Montoya et al., 2017). 

The first model hypothesizes that individuals seek and prefer an optimal (usually moderate) level of arousal. The second model conceptualizes the mere exposure effect in terms of the combined effects of habituation, which makes new stimuli easier to process and less threatening, and boredom, which results in the decline of positive affect. 

In the same vein, the dual-process theory predicts an increase in the strength of response towards familiar stimuli due to the sensitization attributable to a transient "spike" in arousal (which translates into an increase in exploration), followed by the decrease in response to the stimulus that characterized habituation and boredom. 

Several studies in infants examined the effect of two types of habituation: short, incomplete habituation (habituation is partially induced), and longer, more complete habituation (i.e. when resulting in a substantial drop in behavior, typically 50% of the initial level; Colombo & Bundy, 1983; Hunter et al., 1983; Hunter et al., 1982; Lasky, 1980; Roder et al., 2000; Rose et al., 1982). 

In line with the optimal-level and the two-factor models, incomplete habituation leads to a preference for processing familiar stimuli, while more complete habituation leads to a preference for processing novel ones. 

In support of the dual-process theory, other infant studies demonstrated that more complex stimuli generally produce sensitization (i.e., increases in looking) at early points during repetitive stimulus sequences (Bashinski et al., 1985; Colombo et al., 1997; Kaplan & Werner, 1987; Peterzell, 1993). The differential subjective preference for novel stimuli as a function of the level of exposure has been observed in infants and adults (Montoya et al., 2017). 

To our knowledge, visual exploration has not yet been examined in adults. This is even though all theoretical models postulate that this represents a general learning mechanism, and thus it should be present across life. 

By combining a visual exploration task of novel and familiar pictures with an explicit evaluation task, the current study examines the roles of response to novelty and subjective preference in visual exploration. 

Hence, the first goal of this study was to determine whether novelty exploration in adults also depends on the level of habituation, as observed in babies. If so, we should observe that short exposure leads to exploratory behavior towards familiarity and that longer exposure leads to novelty exploration. The second goal was to evaluate participants' attitudes towards the stimuli to which they habituated. 

According to the mere exposure effect, we should observe that the more a picture is presented, the more participants tend to consider it positive, and thus prefer it. According to the optimal level of arousal and the two-factor model of mere exposure, this should be true only up to a certain level of exposure (see Table 1).

For more information:1950477648nn@gmail.com