Targeting The Frontoparietal Network Using Bifocal Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation During A Motor Sequence Learning Task in Healthy Older Adults Part 1

abstract

Background: Healthy older adults show a decrease in motor performance and motor learning capacity as well as in working memory (WM) performance. WM has been suggested to be involved in motor learning processes, such as sequence learning. Correlational evidence has shown the involvement of the frontoparietal network (FPN), a network underlying WM processes, in motor sequence learning. 

Motor learning refers to methods to improve learning efficiency and memory through sports, music, dance, martial arts, etc. Different from traditional learning methods, motor learning pays more attention to the coordinated operation of the body and brain, making learning more relaxed and enjoyable.

The impact of motor learning on memory is very significant. Through exercise, we can improve the body's metabolic level, accelerate blood circulation, and fully supply oxygen and nutrients to the brain. At the same time, motor learning can also stimulate the hippocampus in the brain, which is a key memory storage area that can help us better remember and understand knowledge.

In addition, motor learning can also improve people's concentration and concentration. During exercise, the human body secretes large amounts of neurotransmitters such as dopamine and adrenaline, which can make us feel more positive and energetic. This is very helpful for us to better focus on learning tasks.

In motor learning, we can choose a variety of exercise methods, such as skipping rope, playing basketball, dancing, yoga, etc. Different exercise methods have different effects on the brain. For example, dancing can help us better control the rhythm of the body and improve spatial awareness; playing basketball can help us better perceive the external environment and deal with complex situations.

In short, motor learning plays an important role in improving our learning efficiency and memory. We should integrate exercise into daily learning, make full use of the synergy of the body and brain, and learn and grow more enjoyably. It can be seen that we need to improve our memory. Cistanche deserticola can significantly improve memory because Cistanche deserticola is a traditional Chinese medicinal material with many unique effects, one of which is to improve memory. The efficacy of minced meat comes from the various active ingredients it contains, including acid, polysaccharides, flavonoids, etc. These ingredients can promote brain health in various ways.

Click know 10 ways to improve memory

However, causal evidence is currently lacking. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) studies have focused so far predominantly on motor-related areas to enhance motor sequence learning while areas associated with more cognitive aspects of motor learning have not yet been addressed. Hypothesis: In this study, we aim to provide causal evidence for the involvement of WM processes and the underlying FPN in the successful performance of a motor sequence learning task by using theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) targeting the FPN during a motor sequence learning task.

Methods: In a cohort of 20 healthy older adults, we applied bifocal tACS in the theta range to the FPN during a sequence learning task. With the use of a double-blind, cross-over design, we tested the efficacy of active compared to sham stimulation. Two versions of the motor task were used: one with high and one with low WM load, to explore the efficacy of stimulation on tasks differing in WM demand. Additionally, the effects of stimulation on WM performance were addressed using an N-back task. The tACS frequency was personalized using EEG measuring the individual theta peak frequency during the N-back task.

Results: The application of personalized theta tACS to the FPN improved performance during the motor sequence learning task with a high WM load (p < .001), but not with a low WM load. Active stimulation significantly improved both speed (p < .001), and accuracy (p ¼ .03) during the task with a high WM load. In addition, the stimulation paradigm improved performance on the N-back task for the 2-back task (p ¼ .013), but not for 1-back and 3-back.

Conclusion: The performance during a motor sequence learning task can be enhanced using personalized bifocal theta tACS to the FPN when the WM load is high, indicating that the efficacy of this stimulation paradigm is dependent on the cognitive demand during the learning task. These data provide further causal evidence for the critical involvement of WM processes and the FPN during the execution of a motor sequence learning task in healthy older. These findings open new exciting possibilities to counteract the age-related decline in motor performance, learning capacity, and WM performance.

1. Introduction

The ability to acquire new motor skills is important in daily life. Motor learning is a practice-dependent process in which movements are performed quicker and more accurately [1]. A vast amount of research has contributed to an increased understanding of the neural substrates and underlying mechanisms involved in the acquisition, consolidation, and retention of new motor skills. Neuroscientific studies have focused predominantly on the motor network and the pivotal role of the primary motor cortex (M1) [2e4]. 

This is especially the case for non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) studies that attempt to improve motor learning by combining the practice of a challenging motor task with a stimulation paradigm [5e8]. However, studies have suggested that challenging motor tasks, such as motor sequence learning (MSL), do not rely exclusively on motor-related processes, but also on cognitive processes, such as working memory (WM) [4,9,10]. Surprisingly, WM-related brain areas have not been a target for NIBS paradigms intended to study MSL.

MSL is a process where independent movements are associated, eventually resulting in a multi-element sequence that can be performed quickly and accurately [4,11]. Studies have shown the involvement of WM in MSL [12e14]. WM refers to the ability to temporarily store and manipulate information in the mind [15]. Inter-individual variability in WM e.g., consists of the number of items that can be held and worked with [4]. This is important for MSL, especially during the process of grouping elements of the sequence in “chunks”. 

This chunking process results in quicker execution of the movements [16e18]. Many studies have shown that healthy older show a decline in the ability to learn motor sequences [12,14]. Moreover, aging decreases cognitive functions including WM [19]. Therefore, an interaction among age, WM capacity, and MSL has been recently suggested [14], though causal evidence in favor of this suggestion remains limited.

A promising neurotechnology to provide causal evidence is the use of NIBS, such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) [20e23]. This technique allows to exogenously interfere with ongoing oscillatory activity and to target specific networks, such as the fronto-parietal network (FPN), to enhance or decrease specifically respective cognitive functions, such as WM processes [24,25]. 

The FPN, a network related to WM, is activated during motor sequence tasks [18,26e29]. Cognitive processes rely on coordinated interactions within and among brain networks, implemented in the brain by oscillatory activity [30,31]. For example, efficiency is increased by oscillatory synchronization of neuronal firing, which creates ensembles of neurons that carry out specific computational functions [31,32]. The main working mechanism of tACS is to entrain or synchronize neuronal networks [20,33]. 

The stimulation frequency is adjusted to match the endogenous oscillatory frequency and its brain state. More specifically, tACS allows exogenously interaction with ongoing oscillations, which can result in enhanced coherence within networks with the respective behavioral impact [23,33,34]. Neuronal oscillations in the theta range (4e8 Hz) are engaged in WM tasks, with an increase in theta power during increased WM load [35e37]. Polania et al. and Violante et al. have shown a causal relationship between the synchronization of theta oscillations with a relative 0⁰ phase difference in the FPN and the improvement of WM performance [24,25]. However, knowledge about the effects of tACS-induced synchronization of theta oscillations in the FPN and MSL is lacking.

In this study, we aimed to determine a causal relationship between WM and MSL in healthy older adults. To do this, personalized theta tACS was applied to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) intended to improve MSL using the training of the sequential finger tapping task (SFTT) [3]. To evaluate the importance of WM during MSL and how this is affected by the FPN stimulation, two versions of the SFTT were used. The versions differed in terms of low vs. high WM load. 

WM load was kept low by explicitly showing the sequence on a screen during the task [38]. In the high WM load version, the sequence had to be memorized before the task and was not shown during the task. This online maintenance of the sequence while performing the movements relies relevantly on WM processes [39]. 

In addition, we verify whether the present stimulation paradigm improves WM with the use of an N-back task [24]. With this study, we introduce the FPN as an additional stimulation target location for motor performance and learning enhancement and shine a light on the importance of taking cognitive processes into account during MSL paradigms.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

In this study, we recruited N ¼ 21 healthy, older, right-handed participants (N ¼ 11 female, mean age ± sd: 69.6 ± 4.4, mean laterality quotient Edinburgh handedness inventory 85.03 ± 17.3) [40]. The data of N ¼ 20 participants were considered due to a dropout of one participant caused by an unrelated change in physical health. Inclusion criteria were: 60 years [41e43], right-handed, and absence of contraindications for transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). 

Exclusion criteria were: neuropsychiatric diseases, history of seizures, medication that potentially interacts with tES, musculoskeletal dysfunction that impairs finger movements, professional musician, and intake of narcotic drugs. All participants have signed an informed consent. The study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki [44]. Ethical approval was obtained from the cantonal ethics committee in Vaud, Switzerland (project number: 2017-00765).

2.2. Experimental design

The design of this study was double-blind, sham-controlled, and cross-over. It consisted of two sessions before cross-over and two sessions after cross-over. During the session on day 1, the participants were informed, screened, and asked to fill in three different questionnaires (tES safety questionnaire, Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI), Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)) [40,45]. Afterward, the participants performed an Nback test with EEG acquisition for peak frequency analysis. 

Following the EEG measurement, the participants did the motor training and the cognitive training with concurrent tACS. The next day the participants performed only the motor training with tACS. The stimulation condition was kept the same on both consecutive days and was changed after cross-over. The order of stimulation was defined in a pseudo-randomized fashion by an experimenter not involved in the data acquisition.

The blindness for stimulation condition of both the participant and experimenter was ensured by an additional experimenter who set the parameters and turned on the stimulators during the experiment. Between the before and after cross-over sessions there was a minimum period of two weeks, based on our previous work [46]. The same tasks, with different sequences, were repeated after cross-over, excluding the questionnaires. Please see Fig. 1 A for the timeline of the study design.

For more information:1950477648nn@gmail.com