Understanding Amyloid Structures And Disease: A Continuing Challenge in Health Research

Neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs), including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s diseases, are a highly prevalent class of disorders that share the presence of aberrant aggregates called amyloids in the nervous system [1]. Amyloidogenic proteins are relatively small, typically soluble, and intrinsically disordered proteins that undergo remarkable conformational re-arrangements associated with a process of aggregation and self-assembly that ultimately leads to the formation of fibrillar aggregates designated as amyloid fibrils. 

Click to cistanche herba for Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease

Even though recent years have witnessed an increasing interest in the self-assembly of amyloidogenic proteins [2], with growing numbers of multidisciplinary scientific approaches, the elucidation of the atomic structure of amyloid fibrils formed from their intact protein precursors and the mechanisms relating to fibril formation to disease have remained elusive. 

Over the last few decades, there have been extensive efforts to develop novel inhibitors and modulators as potential therapeutics for amyloidogenic protein aggregation and the development of amyloid disease [3]. Up to the present, however, drug therapies have been used to provide almost exclusively symptomatic benefits, and there is still an urgent need for accurate diagnostic approaches and innovative therapeutics able to prevent or delay the onset of the disease. As elegantly reviewed in this Special Issue by Jin et al. [4], amyloidogenic proteins are appealing potential biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases, but their diagnostic success is intertwined with the development of combined detection strategies, involving other types of biomarkers, organ systems, and ultra-sensitive technologies. 

Several studies have shown that transthyretin (TTR), a well-known transporter of thyroid hormones (THs) and vitamin A, is a significant binder of amyloid beta (Aβ) in cerebrospinal fluid and plays an essential role in suppressing Aβ aggregation in neurodegenerative pathologies [5]. As well-described by Saponaro et al. [6], the TTR/Aβ complex is emerging as a possible biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), highlighting the intriguing potential of TTR stabilizers as novel targets for therapeutic intervention in AD. 

By combining nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, computational simulation, and biochemical assays, Kim et al. [7] found that a small series of diphenylmethane-based thyroid hormone analogs, including well-characterized lipid-lowering agent Sobetirome [8], originally named GC-1, and recently developed TRβ selective agonist IS25 and its prodrug TG68 [9,10] act as TTR stabilizers and efficient suppressors of TTR aggregation, further expanding the potential of thyromimetics as multi-functional therapeutic molecules for TTR-related pathologies, including NDDs. 

In addition, Bcl-xL, a pro-survival protein involved in apoptosis regulation [11], has been previously reported to form various types of fibers, from native to amyloid conformations. By developing specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against amyloidogenic conformations of Bcl-xL, Gonneaud et al. [12] were able to detect the presence of Bcl-xL in amyloid aggregates in neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell lines. 

Therefore, these mAbs may further help develop new diagnostics and therapies, by exploiting Bcl-xL as a strategic target for NDDs. It is important to note that even though the successful application of monoclonal antibodies in AD therapy is still being debated [13], in October 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) accepted Biogen’s monoclonal antibody Aducanumab as a potential AD drug, as did the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2021. 

As described in Robinson et al.’s report [14], peptide-based Aβ aggregation inhibitors are potential preventative strategies that have some advantages as compared to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), including low immunological profile, small size, and tunable, drug-like characteristics. By using mouse hippocampal-derived HT22 cells, the authors showed that two of the tested synthetic pseudo-peptide inhibitors, namely SG inhibitors, developed using a rational drug design approach and predicted to bind Aβ in anti-parallel orientation, demonstrated neuroprotection against Aβ(1–42). 

On the other hand, a third inhibitor, predicted to bind parallel to Aβ, was not neuroprotective. They also showed that myristoylation of SG inhibitors, intended to enhance delivery across the blood–brain barrier (BBB), resulted in cytotoxicity. Overall, by applying three different methodological approaches, including molecular dynamics simulations, single molecule biophysical studies, and in vitro cell viability assays, Robinson et al. provided fundamental clues to the future development of peptide aggregation inhibitors against Aβ toxicity. Serum amyloid A (SAA) is one of the most important precursor amyloid proteins and plays a vital step in amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis [15]. 

In their study, Lin et al. [16] showed that rosmarinic acid (RA), which is a well-known inhibitor of the aggregation of amyloid β (Aβ), displayed inhibitory activity against SAA aggregation in vitro using a microliter-scale high-throughput screening (MSHTS) system with quantum-dot nanoprobes. These findings suggest that the dietary intake of RA enhanced the amyloid aggregation inhibitory activity of blood and suppressed SAA deposition in organs. 

This study also demonstrated that the MSHTS system could be applied to in vitro screening and to monitor the comprehensive activity of metabolized foods adsorbed by blood. Recent data indicate that molecular chaperones and chaperone-like proteins can inhibit the formation of pathological amyloid fibrils [17]; therefore, the chaperone-based therapy of amyloidosis has recently been proposed [18]. 

However, while a large number of studies indicate that these proteins can be specifically and effectively targeted to slow or prevent amyloid disease progression, their effects on mature amyloid fibrils are currently a much less studied problem. Considering that amyloidosis is often detected at the late stages of the disease when a large number of amyloid plaques have already accumulated in the patient’s body, targeting mature amyloid fibrils is of high importance for the treatment of progressive amyloidosis. 

In this regard, the work of Stepanenko et al. [19] showed that a heat shock protein, alpha-B-crystallin, which is capable of inhibiting fibrillogenesis and is found in large quantities as a part of amyloid plaques, can induce the degradation of mature amyloids by reducing the ordering of these protein aggregates under physiological conditions. The authors emphasize that the activity of chaperons and chaperon-like proteins has Janus head features, the pathophysiological manifestation of which may depend on the balance of cellular proteostasis. It is therefore necessary to consider that a chaperone-based therapy for amyloidosis might require particular caution. 

Even though the involvement of nascent Aβ monomers in the pathological route of AD is currently considered to be the most relevant [20,21], an emerging perspective suggests that nascent Aβ, out of the amyloidogenic pathway, plays a physiological and protective role, especially in the brain [22]. Rondelli et al. [23] reported that when cleaved from parent amyloid precursor protein (APP), nascent Aβ monomer may interact with a nearby membrane environment on its way to the target. 

Therefore, by using an innovative integrated approach comprising small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray scattering, and neutron reflectometry (NR), the authors were able to observe the details of the interaction of Aβ monomers with membranes, with no invasivity. 

Notably, their work revealed that the rules of monomer–membrane engagement and the resulting structural effects are dictated by the chemical–physical properties of the membrane rather than by the Aβ peptide variants. Interestingly, they also unveiled an unknown structural role of Aβ monomers in inducing the tightening of adjacent complex membranes, thereby affecting a basic structural event for cell–cell adhesion and cell motility Recent studies have demonstrated that in response to damaging stimuli, the brain puts in place restoration mechanisms that relay chiefly on the protective function of astrocytes and microglia [24]. 

As well described by Lana et al. in their review [25], the concerted actions of astrocytes and microglia in the formation of triads with neurons help recognize danger signals and dispose of damaged neurons or neuronal debris by phagocytosis. 

Degenerating neurons are engulfed by microglia, and reactive astrocytes cooperate in the phagocytic event, possibly to prevent the spread of noxious neuronal debris in the tissue. Notably, the mutual interplay between astrocytes and microglia can result in virtuous/vicious cycles which differ in different brain regions. As suggested by Lana et al., a differential reactivity of astrocytes and microglia in CA1 and CA3 areas of the hippocampus in a transgenic mouse model of Aβ deposition (TgCRND8 mice) [26] can be responsible for the differential sensitivity of the two areas to insults. 

Therefore, understanding the spatial differences and roles of glia will substantially contribute to assessing how these interactions can influence the state and progression of the disease and will be critical for identifying therapeutic interventions for AD. In summary, all articles published in this Special Issue provide a significant contribution to the ongoing understanding of amyloid structures and their roles in NDDs. It is a pleasure for the Guest Editor to gratefully acknowledge all the authors for their important contributions to this Special Issue and the advancement of knowledge for accurate diagnosis and therapeutic interventions.

What is the mechanism of Cistanche's treat Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease?

Cistanche contains several bioactive compounds that may have potential therapeutic effects on Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). One of the main mechanisms of Cistanche is its ability to modulate the immune system, specifically by increasing the production of immune cells and their signaling molecules. This immune modulation may help to reduce inflammation in the brain, which is a common feature of both AD and PD.  In addition, some studies suggest that Cistanche may have antioxidant properties, which could also help to protect the brain from damage caused by oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is another factor that has been linked to the development of neurodegenerative diseases like AD and PD.  Finally, Cistanche contains compounds like echinacoside, acteoside, and verbascoside, which have been shown to protect neurons from damage and promote their survival. By supporting the health of neurons, Cistanche may help to slow the progression of AD and PD. 

Reference

1.  Jellinger, K.A. Interaction between pathogenic proteins in neurodegenerative disorders. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 1166–1183. [CrossRef] 

2. Iadanza, M.G.; Jackson, M.P.; Hewitt, E.W.; Ranson, N.A.; Radford, S.E. A new era for understanding amyloid structures and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2018, 9, 4517. [CrossRef] 

3. Giorgetti, S.; Greco, C.; Tortora, P.; Aprile, F.A. Targeting Amyloid Aggregation: An Overview of Strategies and Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2677. [CrossRef] 

4. Jin, Y.; Vadukul, D.M.; Gialama, D.; Ge, Y.; Thrush, R.; White, J.T.; Aprile, F.A. The Diagnostic Potential of Amyloidogenic Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4128. [CrossRef] 

5. Li, X.; Buxbaum, J.N. Transthyretin and the brain re-visited: Is the neuronal synthesis of transthyretin protective in Alzheimer’s disease? Mol. Neurodegener. 2011, 6, 1–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

6. Saponaro, F.; Kim, J.H.; Chiellini, G. Transthyretin Stabilization: An Emerging Strategy for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8672. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

7. Kim, B.; Ko, Y.H.; Runfola, M.; Rapposelli, S.; Ortore, G.; Chiellini, G.; Kim, J.H. Diphenyl-Methane Based Thyromimetic Inhibitors for Transthyretin Amyloidosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3488. [CrossRef] 

8. Tancevski, I.; Demetz, E.; Eller, P. Sobetirome: A selective thyromimetic for the treatment of dyslipidemia. Recent Pat. Cardiovasc. Drug Discov. 2011, 6, 16–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

9. Runfola, M.; Sestito, S.; Bellusci, L.; La Pietra, V.; D’Amore, V.M.; Kowalik, M.A.; Chiellini, G.; Gul, S.; Perra, A.; Columbano, A.; et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel TRβ selective agonists sustained by ADME-toxicity analysis. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 188, 112006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

10. Saponaro, F.; Sestito, S.; Runfola, M.; Rapposelli, S.; Chiellini, G. Selective thyroid hormone receptor-beta (TRβ) agonists: New perspectives for the treatment of metabolic and neurodegenerative disorders. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 331. [CrossRef] 

11. Sattler, M.; Liang, H.; Nettesheim, D.; Meadows, R.P.; Harlan, J.E.; Eberstadt, M.; Yoon, H.S.; Shuker, S.B.; Chang, B.S. Structure of Bcl-xL-Bak Peptide Complex: Recognition Between Regulators of Apoptosis. Science 1997, 275, 983–986. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

12. Gonneaud, A.; Fakhir, F.-Z.; Landas, E.; Le Tallec, E.; Chartier-Garcia, E.; Almunia, C.; Chenal, A.; Forge, V.; Marquette, C. Development of Conformational Antibodies to Detect Bcl-xL’s Amyloid Aggregates in Metal-Induced Apoptotic Neuroblastoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7625. [CrossRef] 

13. Oxford, A.E.; Stewart, E.S.; Troy, T.R. Clinical Trials in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Hurdle in the Path of Remedy. Int. J. Alzheimer's Dis. 2020, 2020, 5380346. [CrossRef] 

14. Robinson, M.; Lou, J.; Mehrazma, B.; Rauk, A.; Beazely, M.; Leonenko, Z. Pseudopeptide Amyloid Aggregation Inhibitors: In Silico, Single Molecule and Cell Viability Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1051. [CrossRef]

15. Jayaraman, S.; Gantz, D.L.; Haupt, C.; Gursky, O. Serum amyloid A forms stable oligomers that disrupt vesicles at lysosomal pH and contribute to the pathogenesis of reactive amyloidosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E6507–E6515. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 16. Lin, X.; Watanabe, K.; Kuragano, M.; Kurotaki, Y.; Nakanishi, U.; Tokuraku, K. Dietary Intake of Rosmarinic Acid Increases Serum Inhibitory Activity in Amyloid A Aggregation and Suppresses Deposition in the Organs of Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6031. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

17. Kim, Y.E.; Hipp, M.S.; Bracher, A.; Hayer-Hartl, M.; Hartl, F. Molecular Chaperone Functions in Protein Folding and Proteostasis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013, 82, 323–355. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

18. Friesen, E.L.; De Snoo, M.L.; Rajendran, L.; Kalia, L.V.; Kalia, S.K. Chaperone-Based Therapies for Disease Modification in Parkinson’s Disease. Parkinson’s Dis. 2017, 2017, 5015307. [CrossRef] 

19. Stepanenko, O.V.; Sulatsky, M.I.; Mikhailova, E.V.; Stepanenko, O.V.; Povarova, O.I.; Kuznetsova, I.M.; Turoverov, K.K.; Sulatskaya, A.I. Alpha-B-Crystallin Effect on Mature Amyloid Fibrils: Different Degradation Mechanisms and Changes in Cytotoxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7659. [CrossRef] 

20. Hardy, J.; Selkoe, D.J. The Amyloid Hypothesis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Progress and Problems on the Road to Therapeutics. Science 2002, 297, 353–356. [CrossRef] 

21. Morley, J.E.; Farr, S.A.; Nguyen, A.D.; Xu, F. What is the Physiological Function of Amyloid-Beta Protein? J. Nutr. Health Aging 2019, 23, 225–226. [CrossRef] 

22. Brothers, H.M.; Gosztyla, M.L.; Robinson, S.R. The Physiological Roles of Amyloid-β Peptide Hint at New Ways to Treat Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 118. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

23. Rondelli, V.; Salmona, M.; Colombo, L.; Fragneto, G.; Fadda, G.C.; Cantu’, L.; Del Favero, E. Aβ Beyond the AD Pathology: Exploring the Structural Response of Membranes Exposed to Nascent Aβ Peptide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8295. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

24. Guo, T.; Zhang, D.; Zeng, Y.; Huang, T.Y.; Xu, H.; Zhao, Y. Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

25. Lana, D.; Ugolini, F.; Giovannini, M.G. Space-Dependent Glia-Neuron Interplay in the Hippocampus of Transgenic Models of β-Amyloid Deposition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9441. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

26. Ugolini, F.; Lana, D.; Nardiello, P.; Nosi, D.; Pantano, D.; Casamenti, F.; Giovannini, M.G. Different Patterns of Neurodegeneration and Glia Activation in CA1 and CA3 Hippocampal Regions of TgCRND8 Mice. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 372. [CrossRef]